Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(January 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Re: NCSA != NCSC
From: Wilner @ DOCKMASTER . NCSC . MIL
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 97 14:53 EST
To: firewalls @ GREATCIRCLE . COM

> I have to say up front that I agree with MJR.
>
> . . . if the firewall software is implemented below the O/S layer
> . . . then the O/S will never even "see" . . .

Everything except boot-up depends upon the O/S.  Nothing is below the "O/S
layer," nor does one speak of such a layer unless one intends "application
layer" and doesn't know an application from an O/S, nor can a single byte be
sent or retrieved over a device (networked or otherwise) unless an O/S is
relied upon, nor can a single access to memory, disk, or what-have-you be
performed by networking code "below the O/S layer," as we so quaintly say,
if there is no O/S involved.

Gentlemen, if this represents your understanding of operating systems and
security, please contribute to alt.brush-sellers, not to firewalls.



Follow-Ups:
Indexed By Date Previous: RE: NT NAT
From: "McMahan, Peg" <PMcMahan @ v-one . com>
Next: Re: Web Site Hacking
From: long-morrow @ CS . YALE . EDU
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: NCSA != NCSC
From: proff @ suburbia . net
Next: Re: Re: NCSA != NCSC
From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com