Ron DuFresne wrote:
> On 23 Jan 1997, Ryan Russell/SYBASE wrote:
> > My server has the symptom...
> > But, I dunno... after all that discussion about
> > trojan DLL's...should I trust you? :)
> > Ryan
> > ---------- Previous Message ----------
> > To: firewalls
> > cc:
> > From: Russ.Cooper @ RC.on.ca (Russ) @ smtp
> > Date: 01/23/97 04:18:34 PM
> > Subject: NT 4.0 Bug FIX
> > I have received and tested a replacement .DLL to fix the TCP135 problem.
> > It has successfully worked on my machines (NT4.0 Server with SP2 and
> > both public hotfixes). Other configurations have not been tested.
> > Anyone interested in receiving the fix should email me and I will send
> > it to you. Please respond back to me with status after applying the fix
> > and I'll summarize to the list. Don't want all you Unix folk being
> > inundated with too much NT stuff.
> > Guess Microsoft must have been watching Todd's email, eh?...;-]
> > Cheers,
> > Russ
> > R.C. Consulting, Inc. - NT/Internet Security Consulting
> > "Why does Plug-n-Play so often turn into Unplug-n-Pay?"
> Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 20:09:57 -0600
> From: Aleph One <aleph1 @
> To: Multiple recipients of list BUGTRAQ <BUGTRAQ @
> Microsoft just released a hotfix for the RPC vulnerability:
> Their quick turn aroudn time leaves to shame Unix vendors that take
> weeks or months to provided a patch. Oh well.
> Ron DuFresne
> "Cutting the space budget really restores my faith in humanity. It
> eliminates dreams, goals, and ideals and lets us get straight to the
> business of hate, debauchery, and self-annihilation." -- Johnny Hart
> ***testing, only testing, and damn good at it too!***
> OK, so you're a Ph.D. Just don't touch anything.
the fix works alrite. so did Russ's. But then again, I have a
feeling that MS has been sitting on this for quite a while.
Maybe they intend it to be included in SP3?
|(_~|^~~| "I-dare-you geysering forth with
TT/_ T"T heartacious good will"
¤ henry ¤
ææææææææ speculations are not good for health ææææææææ