Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(January 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Cisco NAT (was re: <nothing>)
From: oolid @ acqic . org (Joseph L. Moll)
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 1997 14:41:37 -0500
To: Firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM

At 12:23 PM 1/17/97 -0500, Patrick Bartkus wrote:
>Luis Israel Serrano Barge wrote:
>>Just a little question.
>>Can Cisco Routers serve also as an address translation box?.
>
>My Cisco S.E. said that while it will be able to do NAT with IOS 11.2, we
>really DIDN'T want to add that burden to the router. 
>
>Of course, he might have been just wanting to sell us a PIX box. :-)
>
>Patrick
>

It depends on the function of the box.  If it is a backbone router, its
probably not a good idea to burden it with the extra baggage of NAT (or
ACL's for that matter).

Regards,
Joe, oolid @
 acqic .
 org


Indexed By Date Previous: Altavista firewall, configuration help!
From: Jose Luis Delgado <jdelgado @ nexus . net . mx>
Next: re: Perl Scripts/SNMP/Cisco ???? (off topic)
From: minaba @ mail1 . ci . chi . il . us (Mark Inaba)
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Altavista firewall, configuration help!
From: Ruben Sajnovetzky <ruben @ is . com . ar>
Next: Is it just me or is this bounce kind of amusing :-)
From: Bob Beck <beck @ obtuse . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com