Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(January 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: smap, smtpd, qmail, sendmail, etc.
From: johnl @ sealabs . com (John Labovitz)
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 1997 12:53:38 -0800
To: bve @ quadrix . com (BVE)
Cc: firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <9701271845 . AA20821 @ omsk . quadrix . com>; from BVE on Jan 27, 1997 13:45:15 -0400
References: <9701271845 . AA20821 @ omsk . quadrix . com>

One possible downside to qmail is its high efficiency at the cost of
bandwidth and overloading of remote SMTP servers.  When I followed the
qmail mailing list, a few people complained that qmail opened a
separate parallel connection for each recipient, on each host, for
each mail message.  

For example, if qmail was distributing a message to a list on which 50
members had accounts on the same machine, qmail would open 50
concurrent connections, and send a copy of the message over each one,
rather than using a single connection and multiple recipients.

Apparently this can overload a sendmail process quite easily; people
complained that use of qmail could even be interpreted as a denial of
service.  There is a concurrency limit that can be set in the qmail
config files, but as I remember, it was relatively high.

Note that this may have been fixed in recent versions of qmail.

john


Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Raptor EagleNT Firewall Info
From: Linda DuRussell <ldurussell @ pabs . com>
Next: Re: Virus Scan....
From: dharris @ kcp . com
Indexed By Thread Previous: smap, smtpd, qmail, sendmail, etc.
From: bve @ quadrix . com (BVE)
Next: Re: smap, smtpd, qmail, sendmail, etc.
From: Jim Littlefield <little @ hks . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com