Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(January 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Highly available Internet connection
From: fyeung @ fyeung8 . netific . com (Francis Yeung)
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 1997 10:43:38 -0800
To: firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM, mike . starkweather @ anheuser-busch . com, Laura_Bohde @ prenhall . com

Laura,

	What happens to the data - firewall rules, static routes etc,
 ? How you do keep them in sync if one unit is powered off ?

	Thanks.

	Francis

> From root @
 fyeung25 .
 netific .
 com Thu Jan 30 03:32 PST 1997
> From: Laura_Bohde @
 prenhall .
 com
> Date: Wed, 29 Jan 1997 23:20:46 -0500
> Subject: Re: Highly available Internet connection
> To: "'firewalls @
 GreatCircle .
 COM'" <firewalls @
 GreatCircle .
 COM>,
>         "Starkweather; Mike" <mike .
 starkweather @
 anheuser-busch .
 com>
> 
>         
>         We have two routers connected to the Internet configured 
>         identically, as well as two hubs, two firewalls, and two 
>         hubs on the other side.  Then we installed Black Box 
>         power on/off switches (one on each router, and one on 
>         each hub at the other end).  This way we can leave one 
>         network up and the other powered off.  If any device in 
>         the "primary" network fails, with a simple phone call 
>         (our help desk can even do this), one network can be 
>         powered off and the other powered up.  (this way all 
>         equipment can actually have the same IP addresses too.)
>         
>         Hope this helps -
>         
>         Laura
> 
> 
> ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
> Subject: Highly available Internet connection
> Author:  "Starkweather; Mike" <mike .
 starkweather @
 anheuser-busch .
 com> at 
> INTERNET-PUB
> Date:    1/29/97 4:40 PM
> 
> 
> My company wants to move toward Electronic Commerce on the Internet. 
>  One of the requirements would be a highly available, secure 
> connection.  One of the ideas I have considered is two firewalls going 
> out over two routers to two wide area links to two ISPs.  This is a 
> pretty brute force approach.
>         
> Does anyone have any ideas to share on how we might build an Internet 
> connection that would approach 100 percent availability?
>         
> Thanks for all your help.
>         
> Mike Starkweather
> Anheuser-Busch
> 
> 
> 

Indexed By Date Previous: Re: FTP to NT Server behind FW-1
From: "Darwin L. Martinez" <darwin_martinez @ INS . COM>
Next: Re: smap, smtpd, qmail, sendmail, etc.
From: M Lyons <lyonsm @ netbistro . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Highly available Internet connection
From: CCCRE . CCULL @ capital . ge . com
Next: Re: Highly available Internet connection
From: CCCRE . CCULL @ capital . ge . com

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com