Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(February 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Sidewinder vs. Cyberguard
From: jeromie @ garrison . com (Jeromie Jackson)
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 97 10:48:30 CST
To: goertzek @ wangfed . com, willis @ sctc . com
Cc: firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM

> On Mon, 3 Feb 1997, K.M. wrote:
> 
> > However, I have heard that Sidewinder is very difficult to configure, unless 
> > they have managed to greatly improve their interface in new release.  

	Matt Willis wrote:
> 
> Sidewinder now offers a *real* GUI and a command line interface, for those
> of us that like it old-school.  Not that I count as unbiased, but it's a
> night-and-day comparison to the old version...
> 
> We've also done away with the notion of internal and external to allow for
> multiple network interfaces...
> 
> The mail-filter is pretty hip, as well... drag-and-drop and such.
> 

	I would definitely have to agree.  The interface for 3.01 of 
Sidewinder is quite nice (although I still prefer the cf lines for most
admin. tasks).  It is quite easy to open up ports and such, quite a lot
easier than many other firewalls I've seen.

	I would agree, the Mail filtering capabilities are quite cool.. The
drag-and-drop approach, and the configuration of the filtering/auditing is
quite spiff.

Jeromie Jackson
Garrison Technologies
jeromie @
 garrison .
 com 

Indexed By Date Previous: Re: NAT on Cisco PIX vs. ??
From: Chad David <davidc @ enernet . com>
Next: FW1 Address translation installation on multiple inspection module hosts
From: Lee Whitty <lwhitty @ LANcomp . COM>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Sidewinder vs. Cyberguard
From: mcoss @ attmail . com (Michael J Coss)
Next: Re: Secure Telneting into a internal network
From: Adam Shostack <adam @ homeport . org>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com