Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(February 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: MacOS Web Server
From: "Clark, Mike (E&Y)" <MClark2 @ AndersenCorp . com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 1997 07:19:44 -0600
To: "'firewalls @ greatcircle . com'" <firewalls @ greatcircle . com>

>Date: Tue, 18 Feb 97 11:43:01 CST
>From: jeromie @
 garrison .
 com (Jeromie Jackson)
>Subject: Web server security
>
>	I have been looking at the security of the web server itself, and 
was
>wondering what people think about using something like a Macintosh 
for the
>server.  My initial thought is that because it doesn't have a 
command-line
>interface, and all other servers/daemons can be turned off, it would 
be a solid
>OS to use.  I have been looking @ CMW solutions, and they appear to 
be quite
>pricey, out of the range of what most corporations are willing to 
spend (~$30K)


>Jeromie Jackson
>Garrison Technologies
>jeromie @
 garrison .
 com

I know of several shops that have chosen to go with MacOS web servers 
for
precisely what you have noted. It is a pretty difficult OS from a 
hacker's perspective
from the internet. Secondly, due to the high expense of web 
maintenance, firms
like the thought of IS spending more time on improving web page 
content and
"spiffyness" than on maintenance and administration of the web 
server.

In fact, 60% of web servers on the Internet are MacOS servers. (I 
guess I should
back that statement up, so go to URL:
http://www2.apple.com/whymac/gofigure/default.html)

Michael T. Clark


Follow-Ups:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: firewalls
From: "Jan Klabacka" <jkl @ telenor . cz>
Next: New CIFS paper available
From: *Hobbit* <hobbit @ avian . org>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: [FW1] Firewall 2.1 , Solaris and rouing
From: Daniel Strawson <daniel @ elmail . co . uk>
Next: Re: MacOS Web Server
From: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com