>
> I also feel a discussion of multilevel security is valid and useful for those
Great! Then enjoy a discussion, by all means.
But the discussion of multi-level security which you find so interesting
has little to do with my question (and I should know, since it is my
question).
However, since you appear to believe that my questions and technical
interests are yours to hi-jack according to your agenda, then
go ahead and start a thread on anything you wish.
The discussion I am interesting in (since the original comment were
mine) is buffer overflowing on the stack and what vendors are doing
to insure this vunerability is mitigated in their code (period).
Regards,
Tim
> KM
Follow-Ups:
References:
|
|
