Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(March 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: What is Virtual Vault?
From: steve . gailey @ nomura . co . uk
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 97 12:51:51 +0000
To: kempster @ pop . net, root @ cerberus . kempster . net
Cc: firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM, ronald @ trace . com . tw
In-reply-to: <XFMail . 970306071214 . kempster @ pop . net>

     The VV, as shipped is a stand-alone Web server. You don't have to 
     connect it across your Firewall, but you don't get the secure access 
     to internal systems if you don't.
     
     The Web server in the Outside compartment communicates with the CGI 
     programs on the Inside through a trusted gateway program. This program 
     has special privileges which allows it to communicate with the other 
     compartment.
     
     Someone breaking out of your Web server will find themselves in the 
     Outside compartment unable to do anything other that read the HTML 
     content (They can't even change it). Because this is a B2 system, 
     gaining root access doesn't buy them anything either. They could 
     probably run the CGI in the Inside compartment, but this authenticates 
     the connections from the Outside compartment and thus this still 
     hasn't bought an attacker anything.
     
     You could have the Inside compartment connected to the DMZ and still 
     have to get through a Firewall but this is not necessary, and just 
     complicates things. The normal solution is to have the VV in parallel 
     with the firewall. SMTP and outgoing connections use the Firewall, but 
     incoming HTTP uses the VV. The CGI you create in the Inside 
     compartment (No special programming required) has direct access to 
     your internal systems and can do SQL or whatever. The output from 
     these programs is passed back through to the Outside compartment via 
     the Trusted Gateway Agent.
     
     The only problem with VV is the cost. I think we are talking $50,000 
     or so. You could easily just buy CMW at around $4,000 and set the same 
     thing up yourself, but you would need to write the TGA yourself. Not 
     complicated, but you need someone with trusted systems programming 
     experience.
     
     Steve


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: What is Virtual Vault?
Author:  root (root @
 cerberus .
 kempster .
 net) at internet-mime
Date:    3/6/97 11:08 AM


     
On 06-Mar-97 steve .
 gailey @
 nomura .
 co .
 uk wrote:
>     Virtual Vault is a Netscape Web Server running on HP's CMW 
>     (Compartmented mode workstation) OS. The CMW is a B2 trusted version 
>     of their HP-UX 10 UNIX OS.
>     
>     The machine is compartmented to produce an outside and an inside 
>     compartement. If you know about B2 you will understand the advantages 
>     of this scheme for any system which needs to run as a Web server but 
>     also needs access to internal systems.
>     
>     The VV does NOT replace a Firewall. You will still need a Firewall for 
>     all your outgoing services. But you connect the VV across your 
>     Firewall and run you CGI from the Inside VV compartment, with the Web 
>     server itself running in the outside compartment.
>     
>     I have worked with the VV. I am impressed. It is still a little raw, 
>     that is to say you still need B" knowledge to properly configure the 
>     thing, but I don't know why all external Web servers aren't 
>     implemented this way.
     
Is the VV something you can install on the outside of a proxy server 
like Gauntlet or does the VV have to have a direct pipe to your internal 
network from its' inside VV compartment?
     
     
     
>     
>     Steve Gailey
>     Metronome Solutions Ltd.
>     steveg @
 metrosol .
 demon .
 co .
 uk
>     Tel. +44 1892 542 407 Fax. +44 1892 527 873 
>
>
>______________________________ Reply Separator ________________________________
_
>Subject: What is Virtual Vault?
>Author:  firewalls-owner (firewalls-owner @
 GreatCircle .
 COM) at internet-mime 
>Date:    3/6/97 1:55 AM
>
>
>In the newspaper I read an article, that "virtual vault" is better than a firew
a
>ll.
>     
>What is it, and why does HP believe, that their product is better than a firewa
l
>l?
>     
>....  for more information use:
>     
>*   http://www.trace.com.tw          *   gopher://gopher.trace.com.tw 
>*   ftp://ftp.trace.com.tw           *   telnet://bbs.trace.com.tw
>*   sticky:  Ronald  gate.trace.com.tw  (the very fast way to reach me) 
>*   finger (ronald @
 trace .
 com .
 tw) for more info (address,pgp key, .....) 
>*   for talk, P2P, InterCom (picture phone) ronald @
 gate .
 trace .
 com .
 tw
>*   Tel: +886 2 609-0652, Fax: +886 2 600-0132, NET: +886 2 600-2318 
>     
>     
>     
>Ronald Wiplinger    [Taipei, 24h online] 
>     
     
----------------------------------------- 
Ken Kempster     Network Systems Engineer 
E-Mail: Ken Kempster <kempster @
 pop .
 net> 
Date: 06-Mar-97
Time: 07:08:31
-----------------------------------------



References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Solutions for retailers on the net
From: "Michael S Hines" <mshines @ purdue . edu>
Next: Named Pipe and Firewall security
From: Information Services <info @ id-comms . co . uk>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: What is Virtual Vault?
From: Ken Kempster <kempster @ pop . net>
Next: Eagle Raptor on Solaris 2.5.1 for x86
From: "Juan A. Rivera" <jrivera @ hsc . usc . edu>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com