Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(March 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: ATM adapter for SUN
From: "Gregory D. Otto" <gdo @ newf . com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 1997 16:53:26 -0600
To: "Sylvain Maret" <smaret @ datelec . com>, "Greg Woods" <woods @ ucar . edu>
Cc: <firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM>

Don't rememember if this is true or not, but I thought I once saw something
were Firewall 1 did over a 100 mbits with dual ATM adapters.  I am thinking
I saw this back in a Sept 96 Data Comm blurb.  I need to see if I can
verify 
this.

I do know of some testing where an Enterprise 3000 was connected
to a pair of Ultras.  The 3000 had an OC-12 along with one of the Ultras.
The other Ultra had an OC-3 in it.  Together, the Ultras pushed about
500Mbits
through the 3000.  Not too bad!!!

Greg
============================================================================

Gregory Otto                       e-mail  gdo @
 newf .
 com
New Frontier Consulting            WWW     http://www.newf.com
Houston, Texas                     Voice   (713) 718-1358
============================================================================



----------
> From: Greg Woods <woods @
 ucar .
 edu>
> To: Sylvain Maret <smaret @
 datelec .
 com>
> Cc: firewalls @
 GreatCircle .
 COM
> Subject: Re: ATM adapter for SUN
> Date: Tuesday, March 25, 1997 12:16 PM
> 
> > Does every one have already experience with a ATM adapter and what kind
of
> > card do have used ?
> 
> We have a Cisco card with a ZeitNet driver, on a Sun Enterprise 3000
> (Solaris 2.5.1).  All this technology is new; the documentation we
> got with it is sorely lacking (although our network guy is trying
> to get something from cisco). The card works, in that I have
> successfully configured it and accessed network hosts through it,
> but I have not done any performance testing and we're not using it
> in production.
> 
> Aside from the technology being new and the problems associated with
> that, I have my doubts that an Ultra  will really be able to handle a
> full 155 megabits plus do all the firewall stuff (but I have not
> personally tried it). An ATM interface might be overkill; FDDI or even
> switched 10Mbps Ethernet might be enough.
> 
> --Greg

Indexed By Date Previous: RE: RE : IE Mail
From: "A. Ömer Köker" <omer @ superonline . net>
Next: ATM adapter for SUN
From: Blanche Beube <bbeube @ isginc . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: ATM adapter for SUN
From: blymn @ awadi . com . au (Brett Lymn)
Next: ATM adapter for SUN
From: Blanche Beube <bbeube @ isginc . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com