Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(April 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: RE: Two-way IP Address Mapping Needed
From: Bill Stackpole <BSTACKPO @ sla . com>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 1997 09:31:46 -0700
To: "'Geoff . Whale @ lon40 . nt . com'" <Geoff . Whale @ lon40 . nt . com>
Cc: firewalls @ greatcircle . com

Easiest way I know is to use NAT on the router.  (See Cisco's paper on
NAT)  Since this is a leased line and you own part of the company I
would think the security issues should be somewhat diminished.  I
wouldn't
put out the money for a full blown firewall.  I'd use NAT and the
filtering capabilities on the router to handle it.
The NAT capability can be added to a Cisco 2500 series router for as
little as $1,000.

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	firewalls [SMTP:firewalls @
 lon40 .
 nt .
 com]
> Sent:	Thursday, April 17, 1997 5:52 PM
> To:	firewalls @
 greatcircle .
 com
> Subject:	Two-way IP Address Mapping Needed
> 
> --------
> Greetings,
> We need to connect our corporate network via leased line and firewall
> to the 
> network of a company that we part-own. Until now this company's
> network has 
> been isolated and is using IP addresses from the
> internal-use-only-and-don't-pu
> blish ranges.
> 
> We cannot re-number their network,  [snip] 

Indexed By Date Previous: RE: FW-1 & SSL
From: Dennis Roberts <droberts @ excell . com>
Next: RE: remote control thru a firewall
From: Dennis Roberts <droberts @ excell . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Two-way IP Address Mapping Needed
From: "Noel Gatt" <mansys @ keyworld . net>
Next: Re: On the lighter side.... (fwd)
From: "Paul D. Anderson" <pda @ frobnotz . org>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com