Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(April 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: L0pht Scanning - Beware
From: James Morris <jmorris @ intercode . com . au>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 02:16:51 +0000
To: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
Cc: Russ <Russ . Cooper @ RC . on . ca>, lists @ reflections . eng . mindspring . net, tep @ sdsc . edu, firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <199704290818 . BAA01238 @ honor . greatcircle . com>

On Tue, 29 Apr 1997, Darren Reed wrote:

> 
> Hmmm, I still haven't seen a good anology to port scanning.

Perhaps we need to completely drop the analogies and look at computer 
security issues in their own terms, then look at how to address 
generalised issues related to the intent and effect of such actions.

With regard to the latter, the type of questions I'd be asking are:

1) Did the person intend or cause data to be accessed by unauthorised 
persons ?

2) Did the person intend or cause data to be modified (including deletion)
by unauthorised persons.

3) Did the person intend or cause denial of service to authorised users ?

We may never really know a person's intentions, but we should have some 
idea about the effects of their actions with the right tools, procedures 
and people in place.


- James.
--
James Morris
<jmorris @
 intercode .
 com .
 au>
http://www.intercode.com.au/



References:
Indexed By Date Previous: NAT for Solaris 2.5.x
From: Eric Dykema <Eric_Dykema @ sdsi . com>
Next: Re: [NTSEC] Re: L0pht Scanning - Beware
From: Eric Germann <ekgermann @ cctec . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: L0pht Scanning - Beware
From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
Next: Re[4]: L0pht Scanning - Beware
From: rob . holman @ ganda . demon . co . uk

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com