Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(June 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Plug-gw- One to many relationship
From: carson @ lehman . com
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 1997 14:24:02 -0400
To: Anton J Aylward <anton @ the-wire . com>
Cc: "Mark Horn [ Net Ops ]" <mhorn @ funb . com>, Firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <3 . 0 . 32 . 19970604114909 . 00952700 @ the-wire . com>
References: <3 . 0 . 32 . 19970604114909 . 00952700 @ the-wire . com>
Reply-to: carson @ lehman . com

>>>>> "Anton" == Anton J Aylward <Anton> writes:

Anton> Now that's what *I* call a one to many mapping.  You come up with a
Anton> good way to do this and you'll be famous.

Anton> One public address, and a 10.x.x.x of internal addresses and web
Anton> servers.  POW! The address space problem just went away.

It's called NAT (or NAPT) and is part of ip-filter. There are even diffs for 
making the fwtk app proxies work with it. Next question?

-- 
--
Carson Gaspar -- carson @
 cs .
 columbia .
 edu carson @
 lehman .
 com
http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~carson/home.html
<This is the boring business .sig - no outre sayings here>


Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Fortezza's Fate??
From: Vin McLellan <vin @ shore . net>
Next: Re: PIX and Firewall-1
From: Mike Jones <mike . jones @ unifiedtech . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Plug-gw- One to many relationship
From: "Mark Horn [ Net Ops ]" <mhorn @ funb . com>
Next: Re: Plug-gw- One to many relationship
From: Bernd Eckenfels <lists @ lina . inka . de>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com