Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(June 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Siwinder
From: "Taylor's - Jeannie and Dennis" <dennjean @ erols . com>
Organization: California Transplants
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 22:12:27 -0400
To: hound @ ea . net
Cc: Marcelo Diaz <mdiaz @ tandem . cl>, Firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
References: <199706192233 . SAA06059 @ malibu . ea . net>

hound @
 ea .
 net wrote:
> 
> They both suck.  Sidewinder is difficult to manage and not very extensible and
> Firewall-1 is becomming bloated and quite over-hyped.
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > Where I can find competitive analysis between Siwinder and Firewall-1.
> >
> > Thanks a lot.
> >
> > Marcelo Diaz
> > Product Manager
> > Tandem Chile S.A.

I disagree. I have seen the interface with Firewall-1 and it seems to be pretty 
friendly. Although, as with most UNIX based firewalls, there is still an open/vulnerable 
operating system. However, with the Sidewinder, they have taken it a step further with 
their "type enforcement" technology on the operating system. What that means is if 
someone gets the root password they don't own your system. You have to have specific 
rights to read and write to the different type enforced areas of the operating system. 
They also have a "strikeback" feature that will automatically start certain processes to 
track an intruder when they try to attack your network. It has worked for me, and 
tracked down someone to their site. 

As far as competitive analysis, talk to them and get references to places where you can 
visit their site. 

Jean



References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Firewall Checklist v0.1
From: "Kelly E. Gibbs" <kgibbs @ best . com>
Next: Class B Address
From: "Timothy D. Hunt" <timh @ usa . net>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Siwinder
From: hound @ ea . net
Next: Firewall Checklist v0.1
From: Bill Stout <stoutb @ pios . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com