Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(July 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: RE: FW-1 Performance
From: Management Board Secreteriat <walkerj @ gov . on . ca>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 1997 17:25:53 -0700
To: "firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM" <firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM>, "'Frank Post'" <fpost @ metronet . de>

Frank ..... I too had a similar problem on my sparc20 running solstice fw1 2.0 It would run up to 100% when I issued fwstart with an any any any no logging rule set.   Sun sent me patch #103334-06.   which I have just applied ..... I have yet to test it as I am waiting for my change mgmt folks to approve ......

Hope this helps ....... 

James Walker 
Government of Ontario 
Security & Contingency Services  

----------
From: 	Frank Post
Sent: 	Tuesday, July 08, 1997 12:27 AM
To: 	firewalls @
 GreatCircle .
 COM
Subject: 	FW-1 Performance

Is it possible that FW-1 v2.0 on a Sun Ultra-1 needs 60% of the Systems 
CPU Performance, when it is connected to an 6MBit/s Internet Link ?
Even if there are no Rules in (only to Log all other Port than http), and
the DNS Resolution of Logging is Disabled ? 

Thanks, Frank

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Frank Post                                       Email: fpost @
 metronet .
 de




Indexed By Date Previous: Re: How secure is ISDN?
From: "Bob Resino" <pnh1rgr @ mclo10 . med . navy . mil>
Next: Re: NAT immune to traceroute
From: Peter Clark <pjc @ sw . oz . au>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: FW-1 Performance
From: Mike Jones <mike . jones @ unifiedtech . com>
Next: firewall-1 & exec
From: Juan Carlos Gomez <jcgomez @ mad . servicom . es>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com