Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(July 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Firewall Speed contests = Bad thing
From: Rick Murphy <rick @ tis . com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 1997 00:11:16 -0400
To: marc @ sniff . ct-net . de
Cc: stoutb @ pios . com (Bill Stout), firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <199707172014 . UAA00383 @ sniff . franken . de>
References: <2 . 2 . 32 . 19970717164246 . 008c1024 @ 192 . 168 . 0 . 37>

At 08:14 PM 7/17/97 +0000, marc @
 sniff .
 ct-net .
 de wrote:
>One reason, why DataComm was doing this stress test is the upcomming
>need for internal firewalls. 

It's too bad the test was so unrepresentative of real-world IP traffic.
More than 90% of the traffic was FTP, the rest HTTP. Sorta backwards from
the real world..
	-Rick



Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: WINNUKE
From: <kgibbs @ best . com>
Next: RE: LDAP proxy
From: "Stackpole, Bill" <BSTACKPO @ sla . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Firewall Speed contests = Bad thing
From: marc @ sniff . ct-net . de
Next: Re: Firewall Speed contests = Bad thing
From: sangster @ reston . ans . net (Paul Sangster)

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com