Other Indexes

• Previous month (September 1997)
• Next month (November 1997)
• This month, indexed by thread

• Friday 31 October 1997
  • Re: Unlimited Users Firewalls
    From: "Mark 'segfault' Guzman" <root @ lsd . pbx . org>
  • IP Filter 3.2 - Release
    From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
  • Re: Unlimited Users Firewalls
    From: "Mark 'segfault' Guzman" <root @ lsd . pbx . org>
  • Re: Linux et al PFs
    From: "Mark 'segfault' Guzman" <root @ lsd . pbx . org>
  • RE: Linux et al PFs
    From: Brian Tackett <cym @ acrux . net>
• Friday 31 October 1997
  • Altavista SMTPin bungling?
    From: Oliver Tonge <oliver @ superonline . net>
  • PPTP configuration
    From: Tim Lebrun <tlebrun @ internetmci . com>
  • RE: Linux et al PFs
    From: "Zilber, Alexey" <AZilber @ usanetworks . com>
  • Re: Linux et al PFs
    From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb @ FRB . GOV>
  • Re: sex,lies, and application proxy based fw vs Check Point
    From: Eric Vyncke <evyncke @ cisco . com>
  • Re: Pissing Contest (wasRe: Linux et al PFs )
    From: john <zaph0d @ phawd . com-stock . com>
  • Re: sex,lies, and application proxy based fw vs Check Point
    From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
  • Re: sex,lies, and application proxy based fw vs Check Point
    From: "Gary R. Wolfe" <Gary . Wolfe @ Eng . Sun . COM>
  • RE: Linux et al PFs
    From: john <zaph0d @ phawd . com-stock . com>
  • RE: Linux et al PFs
    From: "Zilber, Alexey" <AZilber @ usanetworks . com>
  • Re: sex,lies, and application proxy based fw vs Check Point
    From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
  • RE: Linux et al PFs
    From: "Zilber, Alexey" <AZilber @ usanetworks . com>
  • RE: Linux et al PFs
    From: john <zaph0d @ phawd . com-stock . com>
  • RE: (no subject)
    From: Arthur Young <ahy @ ziplink . net>
  • RE: Linux et al PFs
    From: "Zilber, Alexey" <AZilber @ usanetworks . com>
  • Pissing Contest (wasRe: Linux et al PFs )
    From: Anton J Aylward <anton @ Toronto . com>
  • Re: Linux et al PFs
    From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb @ FRB . GOV>
  • Re: Linux et al PFs
    From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb @ FRB . GOV>
  • Re: Obtaining an Export License
    From: Chris Lonvick <clonvick @ cisco . com>
  • Re: FIREWALL: Encryption round up?
    From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
  • Re: sex,lies, and application proxy based fw vs Check Point
    From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
  • Re: Linux et al PFs
    From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
  • DMZ Implementation
    From: Gaddy Gumbao <succesor @ mnl . sequel . net>
  • Re: DNS on the Firewall - security problem
    From: Gaddy Gumbao <succesor @ mnl . sequel . net>
  • RE: split-dns-configuration
    From: manuel . ricca @ pararede . pt
  • FIREWALL: Encryption round up?
    From: Doug Bridgens <Doug . Bridgens @ 3Dlabs . com>
  • RE: Need an EVAL Serial NO.
    From: Russian_boy @ miem . ropnet . ru
  • Re: Linux et al PFs
    From: john <zaph0d @ phawd . com-stock . com>
  • Help needed with cisco PIX syslog message
    From: "Randy.Witlicki."<randy . witlicki @ valley . net>
  • Re: sex,lies, and application proxy based fw vs Check Point
    From: "Michael S Hines" <mshines @ purdue . edu>
  • Re: Linux et al PFs
    From: Greg Whalin <gwhalin @ numerix . com>
  • Re: split-dns-configuration
    From: "Simon J. Gerraty" <sjg @ quick . com . au>
  • Re: Linux et al PFs
    From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
  • Re: Linux et al PFs
    From: "Mark 'segfault' Guzman" <root @ lsd . pbx . org>
  • Re: Linux et al PFs
    From: john <zaph0d @ phawd . com-stock . com>
  • Re: Linux et al PFs
    From: Joe Klemmer <klemmerj @ webtrek . com>
  • Re: sex,lies, and application proxy based fw vs Check Point
    From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
• Thursday 30 October 1997
  • Re: split-dns-configuration
    From: Bernd Eckenfels <lists @ lina . inka . de>
  • Re: ICMP Packet through Firewall / router
    From: Bernd Eckenfels <lists @ lina . inka . de>
  • Re: Linux et al PFs
    From: Greg Whalin <gwhalin @ numerix . com>
  • RE: Eagle Raptor firewall
    From: Chris Abberley <chris . abberley @ newbase . com . au>
  • RE: Antivirus
    From: Jerry Huyghe <jerry @ us . esafe . com>
  • httpd stopped responding on Raptor V3.1
    From: Klaus . Kolari @ valmet . com
  • Re: sex,lies, and application proxy based fw vs Check Point
    From: "Ryan Russell"<ryanr @ sybase . com>
  • Re: split-dns-configuration
    From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb @ FRB . GOV>
  • Re: Linux et al PFs
    From: john <zaph0d @ phawd . com-stock . com>
  • Re: Linux et al PFs
    From: David Lang <dlang @ diginsite . com>
  • Re: Obtaining an Export License
    From: john <zaph0d @ phawd . com-stock . com>
  • Eagle Raptor firewall
    From: sz-techserv <hostmaster @ presidency . com>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Joe Loiacono <jloiacon @ csc . com>
  • split-dns-configuration
    From: "Bley, Hans" <Hans . Bley @ stk . bayern . de>
  • Linux et al PFs
    From: MIKE JENKINS <JENKINS . MIKE @ EPAMAIL . EPA . GOV>
  • Obtaining an Export License
    From: "Steven Johnson (BUS)" <johnson @ bayflash . stpt . usf . edu>
  • Re: "SYN" protection product leads...
    From: Steve and Jill Lodin <swlodin @ iquest . net>
  • Re: [Off-topic] Newbie Question - Can Quake melt your network?
    From: "Daniel \"Cheez\" Brown" <cheez @ cheez . lowprofile . net>
  • Re: ICMP Packet through Firewall / router
    From: "Jesús Cea Avión" <jcea @ argo . es>
  • Re: sex,lies, and application proxy based fw vs Check Point
    From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
  • Re: sex,lies, and application proxy based fw vs Check Point
    From: "Ryan Russell"<ryanr @ sybase . com>
  • Feed Back
    From: "larry" <hountz @ diningtable . com>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: "Ryan Russell"<ryanr @ sybase . com>
  • Re: AG and SPF differences
    From: "Ryan Russell"<ryanr @ sybase . com>
  • Firewal-1 on Windows NT 4.0
    From: fw1 @ cmbchina . com (fw1)
  • RE: Raptor Eagle for NT v4.0
    From: "Jarmon, Don R" <drjarmon @ ingr . com>
  • Re: [Off-topic] Newbie Question - Can Quake melt your network?
    From: Andrew Reardon <areardon @ citec . qld . gov . au>
  • Re: sex,lies, and application proxy based fw vs Check Point
    From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
• Wednesday 29 October 1997
  • Re: ICMP Packet through Firewall / router
    From: "Michael S Hines" <mshines @ purdue . edu>
  • Re: Algorithmically derived passwords
    From: acr @ als . co . uk (Alan C. Ramsbottom)
  • Re: Newbie Question
    From: "Michael S Hines" <mshines @ purdue . edu>
  • Re: sex,lies, and application proxy based fw vs Check Point
    From: Adam Shostack <adam @ homeport . org>
  • Re: sex,lies, and application proxy based fw vs Check Point
    From: "Ryan Russell"<ryanr @ sybase . com>
  • Re: sex,lies, and application proxy based fw vs Check Point
    From: "Ryan Russell"<ryanr @ sybase . com>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: "Ryan Russell"<ryanr @ sybase . com>
  • Re: strong encryption for Europeans
    From: "Magossa'nyi A'rpa'd" <mag @ bunuel . tii . matav . hu>
  • RE: [Off-topic] Newbie Question - Can Quake melt your network?
    From: Chris Pugrud <ChrisP @ steldyn . com>
  • AG and SPF differences
    From: Patrick Lee <patlee @ panix . com>
  • Re: Firewalls-Digest V6 #513
    From: Mark hickey <Mark . Hickey @ veritas . com>
  • Re: Network & NT Mailing Lists
    From: "Michael H. Warfield" <mhw @ wittsend . com>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Frederick M Avolio <avolio @ tis . com>
  • Network & NT Mailing Lists
    From: "Hisham Abdullatif Al-Rumaihi" <rumaihi @ admin . uob . bh>
  • Re: sex,lies, and application proxy based fw vs Check Point
    From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
  • Re: "SYN" protection product leads
    From: Don Lewis <Don . Lewis @ tsc . tdk . com>
  • Re: sex,lies, and application proxy based fw vs Check Point
    From: Adam Shostack <adam @ homeport . org>
  • Re: "SYN" protection product leads
    From: "Jesús Cea Avión" <jcea @ argo . es>
  • Re: sex,lies, and application proxy based fw vs Check Point
    From: ccf15429 @ cc . iitd . ernet . in (Akhila Sinha)
  • Re: sex,lies, and application proxy based fw vs Check Point
    From: "Simon J. Gerraty" <sjg @ quick . com . au>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
  • Re: Are there problems by Windows NT server?
    From: Stepken <stepken @ edina . xnc . com>
  • Re: sex,lies, and application proxy based fw vs Check Point
    From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
  • Re: (no subject)
    From: Rabid Wombat <wombat @ mcfeely . bsfs . org>
  • sex, lies and firewalls
    From: Jeromie Jackson <jeromie @ garrison . com>
  • RE: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Jeromie Jackson <jeromie @ garrison . com>
  • (no subject)
    From: Christopher Hornor <cwestern @ gte . net>
  • firewall software
    From: Christopher Hornor <cwestern @ gte . net>
• Tuesday 28 October 1997
  • Re: Newbie Question
    From: citecajr @ citec . qld . gov . au (Andrew Reardon)
  • Re: sex,lies, and application proxy based fw vs Check Point
    From: Rafi Sadowsky <rafi @ tavor . openu . ac . il>
  • Re: sex,lies, and application proxy based fw vs Check Point
    From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
  • Raptor Eagle for NT v4.0
    From: "Fouts, Michael" <MFouts @ citgroup . com>
  • Re: Are there problems by Windows NT server?
    From: Johannes Schwabe <johannes . schwabe @ informatik . tu-chemnitz . de>
  • Re: "SYN" protection product leads...
    From: Johannes Schwabe <johannes . schwabe @ informatik . tu-chemnitz . de>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: "Ryan Russell"<ryanr @ sybase . com>
  • Re: Newbie Question
    From: Natambu Obleton <no @ obituary . margo . org>
  • Are there problems by Windows NT server?
    From: cuco <cuco @ active . ch>
  • "SYN" protection product leads...
    From: James Terry <james . terry @ imx-exchange . com>
  • Re: sex,lies, and application proxy based fw vs Check Point
    From: "Ryan Russell"<ryanr @ sybase . com>
  • RE: Advertisement: "Fish Lovers Only"
    From: Miles Lott <milos @ kprc . com>
  • Newbie Question
    From: ygerman @ genre . com
  • Re: FW: Morningstar PPP for SCO how secure ?
    From: mcnabb @ argus-systems . com (Paul McNabb)
  • Firewalls-Digest V6 #513 -Reply
    From: D (Dave) McWilliam <DMcwilliam @ MarathonOil . com>
  • Re: Comments please
    From: epage @ bhcpns . org
  • Re: Firewall beliefs T/F ?
    From: Vin McLellan <vin @ shore . net>
  • Newbie Question
    From: XXxFeaRxXx @ aol . com
  • Re: strong encryption for Europeans
    From: Martin W Freiss <freiss . pad @ sni . de>
  • ICE.BLOCK FIREWALL
    From: "dennis keller" <dennis_keller @ smtp . ddre . dla . mil>
  • Re: M$ PPTP over FWTK toolkit.
    From: "Alex A. Smirnoff" <ark @ convey . ru>
  • Advertisement: "Fish Lovers Only"
    From: tri-max @ t-1net . com
  • Re: Firewall beliefs T/F ?
    From: Badri Pillai <Badri . Pillai @ ecrc . de>
  • Re: sex,lies, and application proxy based fw vs Check Point
    From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
  • Re: New ftp behavior
    From: trall @ almaden . ibm . com
  • Firewall beliefs T/F ?
    From: ccf15429 @ cc . iitd . ernet . in (Akhila Sinha)
  • Re: New ftp behavior
    From: Bernd Eckenfels <lists @ lina . inka . de>
  • FW-1, packet processing, hardened Solaris
    From: Patrick Lee <patlee @ panix . com>
• Monday 27 October 1997
  • Re: ICMP Packet through Firewall / router
    From: Bernd Eckenfels <lists @ lina . inka . de>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Bill Stout <stoutb @ pios . com>
  • RE: New ftp behavior
    From: "Safier, Adam (GEIS)" <Adam . Safier @ geis . ge . com>
  • Re: Security Evaluation
    From: "Natambu Obleton" <no @ margo . org>
  • Re: Security Evaluation
    From: dynamo @ ime . net
  • RE: Antivirus
    From: G2 Security Division <AFZJ-I-S @ IRWIN . ARMY . MIL>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: "Daniel Wysocki" <DanHu @ bigfoot . com>
  • Re: ICMP Packet through Firewall / router
    From: john <zaph0d @ phawd . com-stock . com>
  • Security Evaluation
    From: "Norman Widders" <winspace @ geko . net . au>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Adam Shostack <adam @ homeport . org>
  • FW: Morningstar PPP for SCO how secure ?
    From: Tim Shoemaker <tshoemaker @ normandev . com>
  • registration
    From: "vidmantas nera tainerasvarbu" <vidma_lt_2001 @ mailexcite . com>
  • RE: SCO how secure ?
    From: "Cimmino, Marcos" <MCimmino @ uniFON . com . ar>
  • Re: ICMP Packet through Firewall / router
    From: Chris Lonvick <clonvick @ cisco . com>
  • Antivirus
    From: "Marcelo Diaz"<mdiaz @ tandem . cl>
  • RE: ICMP Packet through Firewall / router
    From: sundaram @ austin . asc . slb . com
  • ATM
    From: "Marcelo Diaz"<mdiaz @ tandem . cl>
  • firewall for testing purposes...
    From: Kemal Ispirli <kispirli @ syrlang . com>
  • sex,lies, and application proxy based fw vs Check Point
    From: "Mike Weaver, Senior Systems Consultant" <mike @ esr . com>
  • Re: ICMP Packet through Firewall / router
    From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
  • RE: Algorithmically derived passwords
    From: "Heisner, Jeff" <HeisnerJ @ nasd . com>
  • strong encryption for Europeans
    From: "Ekaterina N. Ivannikova" <kate @ forsys . msk . ru>
  • ICMP Packet through Firewall / router
    From: Benjamin Brumaire <brumaire @ arcor . net>
  • SCO how secure ?
    From: "Norman Widders" <winspace @ geko . net . au>
  • New ftp behavior
    From: Petri Virkkula <pvirkkul @ iki . fi>
  • Re: Unlimited Users Firewalls
    From: Bernd Eckenfels <lists @ lina . inka . de>
  • Re: Use of VPNs ??
    From: Vin McLellan <vin @ shore . net>
  • RE: New ftp behavior
    From: "Stackpole, Bill" <BSTACKPO @ sla . com>
  • RE: Morningstar PPP for SCO how secure ?
    From: Wim Olivier <Olivier @ teamwork . co . za>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: "Ryan Russell"<ryanr @ sybase . com>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: "Ryan Russell"<ryanr @ sybase . com>
  • Re: Algorithmically derived passwords
    From: "H. Morrow Long" <morrow . long @ yale . edu>
• Sunday 26 October 1997
  • Re: M$ PPTP over FWTK toolkit.
    From: Kozmando <kozmando @ magpage . com>
  • FUTUREWEAR (fashion, clothing and clubwear)
    From: daniel @ relaxed . com
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Anton J Aylward <anton @ Toronto . com>
  • OtS Music Mag & Classifieds
    From: ots @ infinet . net . au
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
  • Re: Algorithmically derived passwords
    From: Ryan Russell/SYBASE <Ryan . Russell @ sybase . com>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Ryan Russell/SYBASE <Ryan . Russell @ sybase . com>
  • Re: Algorithmically derived passwords
    From: Kogula Palan <palank @ pc . jaring . my>
  • Re: IIOP and Wonderwall (?)
    From: "Simon J. Gerraty" <sjg @ quick . com . au>
  • Re: REMOVES
    From: Ambrose Li <acli @ mingpaoxpress . com>
  • RE: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Frank Darden <fdarden @ locked . com>
  • Re: Unlimited Users Firewalls
    From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
  • Re: Firewalls-Digest V6 #490
    From: dreamwvr <dreamwvr @ nucleus . com>
  • IIOP and Wonderwall (?)
    From: rnourse @ intrepid . intersect . net
• Saturday 25 October 1997
  • [Fwd: FW: Application Gateways and Stateful Packet Filtering]
    From: Chris Brenton <cbrenton @ sover . net>
  • sex,lies, and application proxy based fw vs Check Point
    From: Frank Darden <fdarden @ locked . com>
  • Re: IP addresses
    From: "Sami Yousif" <syousif @ swbell . net>
  • Re: REMOVES
    From: "John Hough" <jbh @ iwbc . com>
  • Re: Unlimited Users Firewalls
    From: "Billy Verreynne" <vslabs @ onwe . co . za>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
  • Re: Unlimited Users Firewalls
    From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
  • Re: Unlimited Users Firewalls
    From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
  • Re: Unlimited Users Firewalls
    From: "Billy Verreynne" <vslabs @ onwe . co . za>
  • Re: New ftp behavior
    From: carson @ tla . org
  • Online Success Direct E-Mail: Get Paid to Advertise!
    From: oss @ online-success . com
  • Re: Unlimited Users Firewalls
    From: Stepken <stepken @ edina . xnc . com>
  • Re: Unlimited Users Firewalls
    From: "Billy Verreynne" <vslabs @ onwe . co . za>
  • Re: Algorithmically derived passwords
    From: Johannes Schwabe <schwabe @ rzaix530 . rz . uni-leipzig . de>
  • Re: Unlimited Users Firewalls
    From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
  • Re: Unlimited Users Firewalls
    From: "Craig I. Hagan" <hagan @ cih . com>
  • Re: Use of VPNs ??
    From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
  • Re: Sanity Check my Java/Security Stance?
    From: Peter da Silva <peter @ baileynm . com>
• Friday 24 October 1997
  • Re: Unlimited Users Firewalls
    From: Stepken <stepken @ edina . xnc . com>
  • NT RAS Security
    From: Leonard Miyata <leonard @ geminisecure . com>
  • Use of VPNs ??
    From: Dick_Wall @ stratus . com
  • Algorithmically derived passwords
    From: sedwards @ sedwards . com
  • Comments please.
    From: scottrob @ mediaone . net
  • RE: Sanity Check my Java/Security Stance?
    From: Joe Klemmer <klemmerj @ webtrek . com>
  • RE: Sanity Check my Java/Security Stance?
    From: "Zilber, Alexey" <AZilber @ usanetworks . com>
  • Re: UDP Port Scanning? (fwd)
    From: Peter Philipp <pjp @ globalserve . net>
  • RADIUS client (off-topic?)
    From: Ryan Russell/SYBASE <Ryan . Russell @ sybase . com>
  • Re: UDP Port Scanning?
    From: Peter Philipp <pjp @ tap . system . ca>
  • Re: mIRC through firewall
    From: "Billy Verreynne" <vslabs @ onwe . co . za>
  • Re: Using DHCP with Firewalls
    From: Anton J Aylward <anton @ Toronto . com>
  • Re: EagleNT and IP forwarding
    From: "M. Dodge Mumford" <dmumford @ btg . com>
  • Re: UDP Port Scanning?
    From: phoenix @ clark . net
  • Re: Using DHCP with Firewalls
    From: Ed Martins <etmartins @ rocketmail . com>
  • Re: Using DHCP with Firewalls
    From: Peter da Silva <peter @ baileynm . com>
  • RE: Rotate the Fw-1 logs
    From: NGM @ TheOffice . net (Dieter Bergmeier)
  • Re: Sanity Check my Java/Security Stance?
    From: Richard Jones <rich @ apricot . mee . com>
  • Re: OFFTOPIC - Just a thought
    From: Rik Hemsley <hemsleyr @ keyline . co . uk>
  • Firewall FW-1 configuration
    From: Lee Nan Phin <nplee @ mol . net . my>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Me <Andrew . Smith @ mail . esrin . esa . it>
  • mIRC through firewall
    From: "Riski Witjaksono"<rwitjaks @ mail . arco . com>
  • Re: Unlimited Users Firewalls
    From: Stepken <stepken @ edina . xnc . com>
  • UDP Port Scanning?
    From: Michael Ferioli <ferioli @ comnet . com . tr>
  • Re: IP addresses
    From: Ederlindo Cojuangco <derts @ cebu . mozcom . com>
  • Re: New ftp behavior
    From: Aleph One <aleph1 @ dfw . net>
  • Using HTTP port for IRC
    From: "Riski Witjaksono"<rwitjaks @ mail . arco . com>
  • Re: Using DHCP with Firewalls
    From: Anton J Aylward <anton @ Toronto . com>
  • RE: OSPF
    From: "James Strompolis" <Jim_St @ classic . msn . com>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Ryan Russell/SYBASE <Ryan . Russell @ sybase . com>
  • HTTP Proxy on Linux
    From: Edierley Batista Messias <ebm @ dcc . fua . br>
• Thursday 23 October 1997
  • Re: suggestion
    From: Gordy Thompson <gordy @ nytimes . com>
  • Re: Using DHCP with Firewalls
    From: Bernd Eckenfels <lists @ lina . inka . de>
  • Re: sex,lies, and application proxy based fw vs Check Point
    From: Frederick M Avolio <avolio @ tis . com>
  • Testing Firewalls
    From: "Cimmino, Marcos" <MCimmino @ uniFON . com . ar>
  • cisco PIX - web access problems
    From: "Randy.Witlicki."<randy . witlicki @ valley . net>
  • Re: suggestion
    From: Roger Hill <alice @ mcalbds . com>
  • Re: Using DHCP with Firewalls
    From: Bill Smargiassi <bill @ lists . smed . com>
  • Firewalls mailing list archives now available via the web
    From: Brent Chapman <Brent @ GreatCircle . COM>
  • Rotate the Fw-1 logs
    From: Alessandro Jannuzzi <jannuzzi @ csn . com . br>
  • RE: Sanity Check my Java/Security Stance?
    From: Joe Klemmer <klemmerj @ webtrek . com>
  • Re: Using DHCP with Firewalls
    From: Frank Darden <fdarden @ locked . com>
  • Re: sex,lies, and application proxy based fw vs Check Point
    From: Frank Darden <fdarden @ locked . com>
  • NFR: htaccess security
    From: jonathan tobin <dyabolyk @ dyabolyk . com>
  • Web Server Question
    From: Larry . Riley @ disclosure . com (Larry Riley)
  • Re: sex,lies, and application proxy based fw vs Check Point
    From: Larry Kwiat <Larry . Kwiat @ gov . yk . ca>
  • Re: suggestion
    From: Ambrose Li <news-misc @ mingpaoxpress . com>
  • RE: Using DHCP with Firewalls
    From: "Stackpole, Bill" <BSTACKPO @ sla . com>
  • EagleNT and IP forwarding
    From: "Artur Alves" <Artur . Alves @ sni . siemens . pt>
  • Re: OFFTOPIC - Just a thought
    From: Rafi Sadowsky <rafi @ tavor . openu . ac . il>
  • Re: Unlimited Users Firewalls
    From: "Billy Verreynne" <vslabs @ onwe . co . za>
  • New ftp behavior
    From: dharris @ kcp . com
  • Re: R: Firewalls, and virus
    From: David Lang <dlang @ diginsite . com>
  • RE: Sanity Check my Java/Security Stance?
    From: Doug Bridgens <Doug . Bridgens @ 3Dlabs . com>
  • M$ PPTP over FWTK toolkit.
    From: Jan John <johnjr @ sprinx . cz>
  • RE: Sanity Check my Java/Security Stance?
    From: Brian Tackett <cym @ acrux . net>
  • Re: Using DHCP with Firewalls
    From: phoenix @ clark . net
  • Re: sex,lies, and application proxy based fw vs Check Point
    From: Frank Darden <fdarden @ locked . com>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Me <Andrew . Smith @ mail . esrin . esa . it>
  • Re: Using DHCP with Firewalls
    From: Anton J Aylward <anton @ Toronto . com>
  • Re: WHATARE FIREWALLS??
    From: "Ewout Meij" <ewout @ pinewood . nl>
  • OFFTOPIC - Just a thought
    From: Rik Hemsley <hemsleyr @ keyline . co . uk>
  • Firewall 3.0b Bug?
    From: David Watson <david . watson @ info-com . com>
  • Re: Using DHCP with Firewalls
    From: "(* Unknown *)" <phoenix @ clark . net>
  • Re: Attacks
    From: Pierre GERMAIN <pgn @ perform . fr>
  • R: Firewalls, and virus
    From: "Franco RUGGIERI" <fruggieri @ selfin . net>
  • RE: Sanity Check my Java/Security Stance?
    From: mmaunder @ bluesky . co . za
  • Re: Sanity Check my Java/Security Stance?
    From: ak @ ansa . co . uk
  • FW-1 configuration
    From: Lee Nan Phin <nplee @ mol . net . my>
  • Re: Unlimited Users Firewalls
    From: "Santi Ribas - Brown's Operating System Services" <santi @ browns . co . uk>
  • Re: Attacks
    From: "icakmakli"<icakmakli @ ykb . com>
  • Re: sex,lies, and application proxy based fw vs Check Point
    From: Frederick M Avolio <avolio @ tis . com>
  • Mail server,DNS, private numbering and firewalls
    From: "Manuel Alcoba"<Manuel_Alcoba @ dmr . ca>
  • WHATARE FIREWALLS??
    From: Jonathan Maphet <kissfan @ one . net>
  • Re: Information
    From: "Todd D. Ellner" <tellner @ cs . pdx . edu>
  • Firewalls BOF at USENIX LISA Conference, Wed 29 Oct 97 10-11pm
    From: Brent Chapman <Brent @ GreatCircle . COM>
  • HTTP Proxy on Linux
    From: Edierley Batista Messias <ebm @ dcc . fua . br>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
  • suggestion
    From: rajan <rajan @ noida . hclt . com>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Bernd Eckenfels <lists @ lina . inka . de>
  • Re: Problems
    From: Brian Mitchell <brian @ firehouse . net>
  • Re: Problems
    From: John Whittaker <john @ zoneoftrust . com>
  • RE: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
  • Problems
    From: "Riski Witjaksono"<rwitjaks @ mail . arco . com>
  • RES: Accessing Exchange Server through a firewall ...
    From: Fernando Cima <cima @ via-net . com . br>
  • Re: Information
    From: rob . holman @ ganda . demon . co . uk
  • Has anyone successfully installed a modem off the console port of their PIX?
    From: jsinnott @ classifind . com (ClassiFind - John Sinnott)
• Wednesday 22 October 1997
  • RE: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Craig Wright <Craig . Wright @ asx . com . au>
  • Another remove..
    From: Dean Sunley <dsunley @ acdat . com>
  • Unlimited Users Firewalls
    From: ygerman @ genre . com
  • RE: Sanity Check my Java/Security Stance?
    From: "Messano, Jim" <jim . messano @ lmco . com>
  • Using DHCP with Firewalls
    From: Ed Martins <etmartins @ rocketmail . com>
  • Accessing Exchange Server through a firewall ...
    From: jcarson @ mail . ameritel . net (Smartronix)
  • Firewall box test
    From: ramamonjisoa @ bnetd . sita . net (Ramamonjisoa Charles Emile)
  • Re: remove mails - solution ?
    From: Rafi Sadowsky <rafi @ tavor . openu . ac . il>
  • Sanity Check my Java/Security Stance?
    From: Patrick Larkin Jr <plarkin @ iphase . com>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Bill Stout <stoutb @ pios . com>
  • [no subject]
    From: smithg @ mercury . stm . com (Gary Smith)
  • Re: OSPF
    From: rich <reybok @ saturn . superlink . net>
  • [no subject]
    From: Martin <a5martin @ leedi . dako . edu . ee>
  • Accessing Exchange Server through a firewall ...
    From: jcarson @ mail . ameritel . net (Smartronix)
  • Microsoft's PPTP / Steelhead
    From: Mike Adams <madams @ orca . net>
  • RE: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
  • (no subject)
    From: Zhao Jun <jzhao @ public . xa . sn . cn>
  • [no subject]
    From: steven_whiteside @ smtplink . sra . com
  • (no subject)
    From: chai <chaikf @ cyberway . com . sg>
  • OSPF
    From: "Anderson, Scot" <sanderson @ btg . com>
  • RE: Accessing Exchange Server through a firewall ...
    From: Miles Lott <milos @ kprc . com>
  • Re: f
    From: Matthias Kolbusa <matthias . kolbusa @ lamarc . com>
  • [no subject]
    From: Victor Kirsha <kirsha @ icl . kazan . su>
  • RE: smap(toolkit) + sendmail8.8.5 and mail relaying
    From: Miles Lott <milos @ kprc . com>
  • (no subject)
    From: Badri Pillai <Badri . Pillai @ ecrc . de>
  • Re: your mail
    From: Nick Simicich <njs @ scifi . squawk . com>
  • Unlimited Users Firewalls
    From: Norhayati bte Abdullah <yati @ mod . gov . my>
  • FW: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: "Craig S. Wright" <craig . wright @ asx . com . au>
  • [no subject]
    From: Manny Lucio <manny888 @ gitic . co . cn>
  • Yellow River
    From: Huang He <victor @ gitic . co . cn>
  • tested yellow river
    From: Huang He <victor @ gitic . co . cn>
  • Re: smap(toolkit) + sendmail8.8.5 and mail relaying
    From: Florian Wolpert <wolpert @ ds . freinet . de>
  • Re: smap(toolkit) + sendmail8.8.5 and mail relaying
    From: "Simon J. Gerraty" <sjg @ quick . com . au>
  • [no subject]
    From: Manny Lucio <manny888 @ gitic . co . cn>
  • RE: 'The best way' to authenticate on a Web Server
    From: "Domenico Viggiani" <viggiani @ hotmail . com>
  • smap(toolkit) + sendmail8.8.5 and mail relaying
    From: Thomas Bleek <bl @ gfz-potsdam . de>
  • f
    From: PHuffman11 @ aol . com
  • RE: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Psihoyios Panayiotes <ppsihoyios @ techno . hol . gr>
  • RE: 'The best way' to authenticate on a Web Server
    From: Vin McLellan <vin @ shore . net>
  • [no subject]
    From: Martin <a5martin @ leedi . dako . edu . ee>
  • (no subject)
    From: Xingzhong Chen <cncxz @ iname . com>
  • [no subject]
    From: Ross family <thunder @ direct . ca>
  • Re: REMOVES -Reply
    From: Scott Fagg <scott . fagg @ arup . com>
  • round robin firewalls
    From: "Prahl V. E. (Von)" <z76399 @ upr . com>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Brian Mitchell <brian @ firehouse . net>
  • [no subject]
    From: Jack Yang <admin @ foxconn . com>
  • Re: IP addresses
    From: Chris Brenton <cbrenton @ sover . net>
  • [no subject]
    From: Phang Wee Meng <wmphang @ mutiara . com . my>
• Tuesday 21 October 1997
  • Re: REMOVES
    From: Ambrose Li <acli @ mingpaoxpress . com>
  • PPTP and IP protocol forwarding (IPfwd)
    From: "C. Scott Ananian" <cananian @ lcs . mit . edu>
  • [no subject]
    From: sgariepy @ ami . qc . ca
  • Accessing Exchange Server through a firewall ...
    From: jordan @ Thinkbank . COM (Jordan Hayes)
  • Info
    From: "Flavio Marcelo C. B. do Amaral" <flavio @ ganimedes . pop-rn . rnp . br>
  • RE: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: "Craig S. Wright" <craig . wright @ asx . com . au>
  • [no subject]
    From: Janet Stucchi <jstucchi @ bbnplanet . com>
  • [no subject]
    From: jhuffman @ msgroup . com (Jim Huffman)
  • How to get removed from the firewalls list
    From: Chris Brenton <cbrenton @ sover . net>
  • Re: REMOVES
    From: Vandana Shah <vana . shah @ asu . edu>
  • Re: Livingston RADIUS-2.0 Security Server
    From: Vin McLellan <vin @ shore . net>
  • Re: REMOVES
    From: Jeff Lord <ccjlord @ gatekeeper . ddp . state . me . us>
  • Information
    From: "Flavio Marcelo C. B. do Amaral" <flavio @ ganimedes . pop-rn . rnp . br>
  • RE: Firewalls, and virus
    From: David Lang <dlang @ diginsite . com>
  • [no subject]
    From: Martin <a5martin @ leedi . dako . edu . ee>
  • Morningstar PPP for SCO how secure ?
    From: "Norman Widders" <winspace @ geko . net . au>
  • Re: Gauntlet, VPN/WAN/Dialups
    From: "zmy" <ga97001 @ public . js . hb . cn>
  • [no subject]
    From: Ronan . Timmons @ ncb . ie
  • [no subject]
    From: "-=KillMe[927]=-" <killme927 @ writeme . com>
  • Re: altavista firewall, SmartGate
    From: mcnabb @ argus-systems . com (Paul McNabb)
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Graham Wheeler <gram @ cdsec . com>
  • discontinue distribution
    From: John Bullock <jbullock @ usa . net>
  • (no subject)
    From: John Bullock <jbullock @ usa . net>
  • Re: firewall and virus
    From: David Lang <dlang @ diginsite . com>
  • Re: REMOVES
    From: Ambrose Li <news-misc @ mingpaoxpress . com>
  • RE: IP addresses
    From: "Stackpole, Bill" <BSTACKPO @ sla . com>
  • Re: Livingston RADIUS-2.0 Security Server
    From: Eric Vyncke <evyncke @ cisco . com>
  • Re: Livingston RADIUS-2.0 Security Server
    From: "Steven R. Wright" <swright @ infi . net>
  • (no subject)
    From: andreav @ snsnet . net
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Peter da Silva <peter @ baileynm . com>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: gary flynn <gary @ habanero . jmu . edu>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Eric Vyncke <evyncke @ cisco . com>
  • Re: IP addresses
    From: Eric Vyncke <evyncke @ cisco . com>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Peter da Silva <peter @ baileynm . com>
  • Re: IP addresses
    From: Ryan Russell/SYBASE <Ryan . Russell @ sybase . com>
  • [no subject]
    From: jhuffman @ msgroup . com (Jim Huffman)
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Graham Wheeler <gram @ cdsec . com>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Jyri Kaljundi <jk @ stallion . ee>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
  • Re: Attacks
    From: Pierre GERMAIN <pgn @ perform . fr>
  • [no subject]
    From: SHOCK9881 @ duq3 . cc . duq . edu
  • RE: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: "Craig S. Wright" <craig . wright @ asx . com . au>
  • Livingston RADIUS-2.0 Security Server
    From: Mario Misic <mario @ laus . hr>
  • IP addresses
    From: "Hisham Abdullatif Al-Rumaihi" <rumaihi @ admin . uob . bh>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Graham Wheeler <gram @ cdsec . com>
  • (no subject)
    From: Usadel <usadel @ FH-Weingarten . DE>
  • Attacks
    From: "icakmakli"<icakmakli @ ykb . com>
  • Re: 'The best way' to authenticate on a Web Server
    From: Domenico Viggiani <viggiani @ pitagora . it>
  • (Kein Bezug)
    From: "B.Stoltefu " <b . stoltefuss @ westlb . de>
  • [no subject]
    From: "Jet B. Bagadion" <jbb @ solidbank . com . ph>
  • WatchGuard anyone?
    From: Sander Beenen <sander . beenen @ ericsson . com . au>
  • [no subject]
    From: todd @ failsafe . com (Failsafe - Todd Hanson)
  • [no subject]
    From: "Seong-Jung, Kim." <sjkim @ hdpc . co . kr>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Anton J Aylward <anton @ Toronto . com>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Bernd Eckenfels <lists @ lina . inka . de>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Rick Murphy <rick @ paimail . com>
  • Re: FWTK-TIS on Linux 2.0.0
    From: Rick Murphy <rick @ paimail . com>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Brian Mitchell <brian @ firehouse . net>
  • Re:
    From: "Baek, Seok-Chul" <scbaek @ rcunix . kotel . co . kr>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Chris Brenton <cbrenton @ sover . net>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Ryan Russell/SYBASE <Ryan . Russell @ sybase . com>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Bernd Eckenfels <lists @ lina . inka . de>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Ryan Russell/SYBASE <Ryan . Russell @ sybase . com>
• Monday 20 October 1997
  • RE: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Rick Murphy <rick @ paimail . com>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Peter da Silva <peter @ baileynm . com>
  • FWTK-TIS on Linux 2.0.0
    From: Edierley Batista Messias <ebm @ dcc . fua . br>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Peter da Silva <peter @ baileynm . com>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Joe Judge <joej @ ultranet . com>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Joe Judge <joej @ ultranet . com>
  • Re: your mail
    From: zaph0d <zaph0d @ phawd . com-stock . com>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Bill Stout <stoutb @ pios . com>
  • Re: 'The best way' to authenticate on a Web Server
    From: Nick Simicich <njs @ scifi . squawk . com>
  • RE: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: "Craig S. Wright" <craig . wright @ asx . com . au>
  • Re: 'The best way' to authenticate on a Web Server
    From: Frank Willoughby <frankw @ in . net>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Frank Darden <fdarden @ locked . com>
  • Re: firewall and virus
    From: Vandana Shah <vana . shah @ asu . edu>
  • RE: 'The best way' to authenticate on a Web Server
    From: "Davis, Rob" <rdavis @ lucentncg . com>
  • RE: Firewalls, and virus
    From: Vandana Shah <vana . shah @ asu . edu>
  • Re: your mail
    From: Martin <a5martin @ leedi . dako . edu . ee>
  • Re: firewalls with linux OS
    From: Stepken <stepken @ edina . xnc . com>
  • Microsoft Exchange through FWTK
    From: David Schnardthorst <ds3721 @ stryder . com>
  • RE: 'The best way' to authenticate on a Web Server
    From: Steve Gaarder <gaarder @ actech . com>
  • [no subject]
    From: Carlos Gonzalez <Carlos . Gonzalez @ digital . com>
  • RE: 'The best way' to authenticate on a Web Server
    From: John Whittaker <john @ credo . net>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Peter da Silva <peter @ baileynm . com>
  • RE: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Ryan Russell/SYBASE <Ryan . Russell @ sybase . com>
  • Re: firewall and virus
    From: David Lang <dlang @ diginsite . com>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Peter da Silva <peter @ baileynm . com>
  • Re: C2 and SCO
    From: Philippe Cayphas <Philippe . Cayphas @ ping . be>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Joe Loiacono <jloiacon @ csc . com>
  • Re: Simple UDP & ActiveX question
    From: Peter da Silva <peter @ baileynm . com>
  • RE: 'The best way' to authenticate on a Web Server
    From: Bruno Coelho Nunes da Costa <akbal @ visualnet . com . br>
  • Re: firewalls with linux OS
    From: Adam Shostack <adam @ homeport . org>
  • [no subject]
    From: MAUGUSTO @ procomp . com . br
  • (no subject)
    From: Marcus Lindholm <ml_aa31 @ ingprog . material . se>
  • C2 and SCO
    From: "Norman Widders" <winspace @ geko . net . au>
  • RE: 'The best way' to authenticate on a Web Server
    From: "Craig S. Wright" <craig . wright @ asx . com . au>
  • RE: Can FireWall-1 (v3.0) authenticate internal users transparently?
    From: "Craig S. Wright" <craig . wright @ asx . com . au>
  • Gauntlet
    From: Mario Misic <mario @ laus . hr>
  • [no subject]
    From: "Alexey Saryichev" <alx @ ftc . ru>
  • [no subject]
    From: must_do <must_do @ hotmail . com>
  • 'The best way' to authenticate on a Web Server
    From: "Domenico Viggiani" <viggiani @ hotmail . com>
  • firewall and virus
    From: Vandana Shah <vana . shah @ asu . edu>
  • (no subject)
    From: csarrion @ montejava . es (Carlos Sarrion Lopez)
  • Transparent authentication for internal users ?
    From: Yinan Yang <YYANG @ nla . gov . au>
  • Can FireWall-1 (v3.0) authenticate internal users transparently?
    From: yny <yny @ nla . gov . au>
  • [no subject]
    From: Marc Dorando <MDorando @ argus . de>
  • (no subject)
    From: sumitr prukjinda <sumitr . p @ psc . tfb . co . th>
• Sunday 19 October 1997
  • RE: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Joseph Judge <joej @ joesmac . ultranet . com>
  • Welcome to firewalls - Instructions on unsubscribing
    From: Vera . Todorovic @ alcatel . com . au
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Frederick M Avolio <avolio @ tis . com>
  • RE: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Rick Murphy <rick @ paimail . com>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Rick Murphy <rick @ paimail . com>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Richard Trott <trott @ remus . rutgers . edu>
  • $1,000,000 For Christmas
    From: emailing @ tnlb . com
  • Re[2]: Stealing data via Internet Explorer 4
    From: Martin Sauer <ms @ skp . de>
  • Re: DNS on the Firewall - security problem
    From: Bernd Eckenfels <lists @ lina . inka . de>
  • Re: DNS on the Firewall - security problem
    From: Bernd Eckenfels <lists @ lina . inka . de>
  • Re: Drifting back on topic with *** Off topic - Hypersonic Stealth Dawg House
    From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
  • *** Off topic - Hypersonic Stealth Dawg House
    From: Sick Puppy <sikpuppy @ maestro . maestro . com>
  • [no subject]
    From: Yinlei Yu <yuyl @ usa . net>
  • Re: Stealing data via Internet Explorer 4
    From: Martin Sauer <ms @ skp . de>
  • sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: bwa @ shadow . dbapic . com . au (Barry W. Anderson)
  • mail acct access
    From: starwolf @ pcez . com
  • Re: firewalls with linux OS
    From: Stepken <stepken @ edina . xnc . com>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Frank Darden <fdarden @ locked . com>
  • RE: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: "Craig S. Wright" <craig . wright @ asx . com . au>
  • [no subject]
    From: must_do <must_do @ hotmail . com>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Brian Mitchell <brian @ firehouse . net>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Richard Trott <trott @ remus . rutgers . edu>
• Saturday 18 October 1997
  • Firewalls, and virus
    From: Vandana Shah <vana . shah @ asu . edu>
  • I: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: "Franco RUGGIERI" <fruggieri @ selfin . net>
  • Re: firewalls with linux OS
    From: "Mark 'segfault' Guzman" <root @ lsd . pbx . org>
  • Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: red @ isr . net (Research Editor)
  • Re: WinGate Proxy
    From: Lee Nan Phin <nplee @ mol . net . my>
  • (no subject)
    From: Param <param @ wipsys . soft . net>
  • Re: [FW1] Re: Virus Protection on FW-1
    From: "Dameon Welch" <dwelch @ hotmail . com>
  • sex, lies, and firewall code
    From: Frank Darden <fdarden @ locked . com>
  • Re: bombing
    From: "travis" <wardt @ flash . net>
• Friday 17 October 1997
  • RE: bombing
    From: Lars Bertelsen <lbe @ login . dknet . dk>
  • Re: bombing
    From: paolo <p . meletti @ virgin . net>
  • Re: udprelay using select() instead of poll()
    From: Rex Espiritu <espiritu @ cgi . com>
  • Re: REMOVES
    From: Nick Simicich <njs @ scifi . squawk . com>
  • Re: bombing
    From: pthermos @ notes . cc . bellcore . com
  • Re: VT emulation through a browser?
    From: wiseleo @ juno . com (Leonid S Knyshov)
  • [no subject]
    From: hodgsone @ itsi . disa . mil
  • Re: WinGate Proxy
    From: phoenix @ clark . net
  • Re: bombing
    From: pthermos @ notes . cc . bellcore . com
  • Re: Simple UDP & ActiveX question
    From: Ryan Russell/SYBASE <Ryan . Russell @ sybase . com>
  • Re: Simple UDP & ActiveX question
    From: Peter da Silva <peter @ baileynm . com>
  • Re: REMOVES
    From: zaph0d <zaph0d @ phawd . com-stock . com>
  • [no subject]
    From: Ken Jones <kenj @ gblhorizon . com>
  • [no subject]
    From: "Donald Six" <sixd @ am . father . umc . akzonobel . nl>
  • Re: Windows NT domain through Gauntlet firewall
    From: Bill Stout <stoutb @ pios . com>
  • [no subject]
    From: Jeff Simms <jsimms @ icondata . com>
  • Re: PIX and other "Black boxes" vs normal firewalls.
    From: Ambrose Li <acli @ mingpaoxpress . com>
  • Re: bombing
    From: Joe Loiacono <jloiacon @ csc . com>
  • Re: Simple UDP & ActiveX question
    From: Peter da Silva <peter @ baileynm . com>
  • [no subject]
    From: jhuffman @ msgroup . com (Jim Huffman)
  • VT emulation through a browser?
    From: Tim Farrell <Tim . Farrell @ bmc . org>
  • Stealing data via Internet Explorer 4
    From: Neil Ratzlaff <Neil . Ratzlaff @ ucop . edu>
  • RE: bombing
    From: Greg Witte <gwitte @ us-state . gov>
  • Firewalls: www & high port number
    From: Exadmin <exadmin @ afiwc01 . af . mil>
  • Re: [FW1] Re: Virus Protection on FW-1
    From: "Kevin Speichts" <kfs @ istar . ca>
  • [no subject]
    From: augusto ewerton dias <augustoe @ antares . serpro . gov . br>
  • [no subject]
    From: bob bryant <rhb1 @ gte . com>
  • [no subject]
    From: Pere Barberan Agut <barberan @ iluro . eupmt . upc . es>
  • multiprocessor firewalls (was: Re: Virus Protection on FW-1)
    From: Jyri Kaljundi <jk @ stallion . ee>
  • REMOVES
    From: SOKIM KHOO <skkho @ khtp . usm . my>
  • bombing
    From: Stguchi @ aol . com
  • [no subject]
    From: Marc Dorando <MDorando @ argus . de>
  • Re[2]: firewalls with linux OS
    From: Oliver Lau <lau @ skp . de>
  • RE: Firewalls: Exchange mail proxy in DMZ.
    From: Rinc Sergej <sergej . rinc @ skb . si>
  • Re: firewalls with linux OS
    From: Brian Mitchell <brian @ firehouse . net>
  • RE: PIX and other "Black boxes" vs normal firewalls.
    From: Emmanuel Yiu <emmanuel_yiu @ tricomhk . com>
  • Re: Promiscuous mode
    From: Bernd Eckenfels <lists @ lina . inka . de>
  • Re: PIX and other "Black boxes" vs normal firewalls.
    From: "Mark Teicher" <mark-teicher @ worldnet . att . net>
  • Re: firewalls with linux OS
    From: Stepken <stepken @ edina . xnc . com>
  • REMOVES
    From: Andy Lewis <alewis @ mpsi . net>
  • WinGate Proxy
    From: Lee Nan Phin <nplee @ mol . net . my>
• Thursday 16 October 1997
  • [no subject]
    From: jphillip @ umr . edu
  • RE: Firewalls: www & high port numbers
    From: Steve Kruse <jsk347 @ worldnet . att . net>
  • Re: PIX and other "Black boxes" vs normal firewalls.
    From: Ambrose Li <news-misc @ mingpaoxpress . com>
  • RE: Firewalls: Exchange mail proxy in DMZ.
    From: "Wolfgang, Karl" <WolfganK @ IRWIN . ARMY . MIL>
  • Re: [FW1] Re: Virus Protection on FW-1
    From: "Ed Sawicki" <ed @ alcpress . com>
  • [no subject]
    From: bob bryant <rhb1 @ gte . com>
  • Connect: Conceal Encryption Server
    From: Larry . Riley @ disclosure . com (Larry Riley)
  • RE: [FW1] Re: Virus Protection on FW-1
    From: Beau Monday <bmonday @ bsquare . com>
  • Re: Firewalls: www & high port numbers
    From: Peter da Silva <peter @ baileynm . com>
  • [no subject]
    From: Ana Catarina Silva <AC . Dark . Shadow @ mail . telepac . pt>
  • Re:RE: Keyword filtering of email through firewall
    From: Avishay Dinar <avishay2 @ wizard . abirnet . co . il>
  • Re: Firewall-1 on NT
    From: "Matt Eide" <matte @ sybron . com>
  • Re: [FW1] Re: Virus Protection on FW-1
    From: "Kevin Speichts" <kfs @ istar . ca>
  • RE: Firewalls: www & high port numbers
    From: trall @ almaden . ibm . com
  • Re: Simple UDP & ActiveX question
    From: Ryan Russell/SYBASE <Ryan . Russell @ sybase . com>
  • RE: Firewalls: Exchange mail proxy in DMZ.
    From: James Terry <james . terry @ imx-exchange . com>
  • Re: Firewalls: www & high port numbers
    From: Leonard Miyata <leonard @ geminisecure . com>
  • Re: [FW1] Re: Virus Protection on FW-1
    From: Jyri Kaljundi <jk @ stallion . ee>
  • [no subject]
    From: Zhu Chun <zhuchun @ buaa . edu . cn>
  • [no subject]
    From: Marc Dorando <MDorando @ argus . de>
  • letter
    From: advide Consonni <owend @ tin . it>
  • RE: Simple UDP & ActiveX question
    From: "Stackpole, Bill" <BSTACKPO @ sla . com>
  • Re: firewalls with linux OS
    From: "M. Dodge Mumford" <dmumford @ btg . com>
  • RE: Firewalls: www & high port numbers
    From: Doug Bridgens <Doug . Bridgens @ 3Dlabs . com>
  • Re: Firewalls-Digest V6 #489
    From: tcooper @ hns . com
  • RE: Firewalls: www & high port numbers
    From: "Stackpole, Bill" <BSTACKPO @ sla . com>
  • RE: Firewalls: Exchange mail proxy in DMZ.
    From: "Stackpole, Bill" <BSTACKPO @ sla . com>
  • Re: Firewall-1 on NT
    From: "Ewout Meij" <ewout @ pinewood . nl>
  • RE: Firewall-1 on NT
    From: Doug Bridgens <Doug . Bridgens @ 3Dlabs . com>
  • [no subject]
    From: Arthur Young <ahy @ ziplink . net>
  • Firewall for linux
    From: cuco <cuco @ active . ch>
  • Re: Virus Protection on FW-1
    From: Frank Darden <fdarden @ locked . com>
  • RE: TCP options and firewalls
    From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
  • Wrong time logged
    From: Alessandro Jannuzzi <jannuzzi @ csn . com . br>
  • [no subject]
    From: Alex Hutton <Alex @ Progressive-Systems . com>
  • Simple UDP & ActiveX question
    From: marcelg @ new . iscorltd . co . za (Marcel Groenewald)
  • [no subject]
    From: "Tom Rozylowicz"<ROZYLOTA @ acq . osd . mil>
  • Firewall-1 on NT
    From: Mario Muehlbauer <mamuehl @ mail . teleconsult . de>
  • (no subject)
    From: Hilco Jonkeren <H . Jonkeren @ ahk . nl>
  • RE: firewalls with linux OS
    From: Ralf Thomas Klar <klar @ mkm . de>
  • Firewalls: Exchange mail proxy in DMZ.
    From: Doug Bridgens <Doug . Bridgens @ 3Dlabs . com>
  • Firewalls: www & high port numbers
    From: Doug Bridgens <Doug . Bridgens @ 3Dlabs . com>
  • Windows NT domain through Gauntlet firewall
    From: Colin Linahan <cfl @ parkville . molsci . csiro . au>
  • RE: firewalls with linux OS
    From: "Sameer R. Manek" <manek @ challenger . atc . fhda . edu>
  • Re: firewalls with linux OS
    From: Oliver Lau <lau @ skp . de>
  • RE: TCP options and firewalls
    From: Peter Ford <peterf @ microsoft . com>
  • [no subject]
    From: zmhu @ bupt . edu . cn
  • ipsilon
    From: "Marcelo Diaz"<mdiaz @ tandem . cl>
• Wednesday 15 October 1997
  • Re: TCP options and firewalls1
    From: Oliver Friedrichs <oliverf @ silence . secnet . com>
  • Firewall
    From: "helen liu" <Helen_Liu @ smtpgate . pericom . com>
  • Re: IIS behind firewall?
    From: Bill Stout <stoutb @ pios . com>
  • RE: firewalls with linux OS
    From: Chris Pugrud <ChrisP @ steldyn . com>
  • Re: firewalls with linux OS (supplement)
    From: Oliver Lau <lau @ skp . de>
  • RE: firewalls with linux OS
    From: "Anderson, Scot" <sanderson @ btg . com>
  • Re: firewalls with linux OS
    From: Oliver Lau <lau @ skp . de>
  • RE: Promiscuous mode
    From: Bob Resino <pnh1rgr @ mclo10 . med . navy . mil>
  • SQL*Net v2 through FW-1 with encryption
    From: Bill Coutinho <bill @ dextra . com . br>
  • (none)
    From: PHuffman11 @ aol . com
  • Re: TCP options and firewalls1
    From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
  • NAT on IBM SNG.
    From: STEVE . CONNOLLY @ arpstl-emh2 . army . mil
  • firewalls with linux OS
    From: jonah <jonah @ chez . com>
  • Re: TCP options and firewalls
    From: Eric Vyncke <evyncke @ cisco . com>
  • DMZ Implementation
    From: rob . holman @ ganda . demon . co . uk
  • (no subject)
    From: Michel Arsenault <mars @ yes . Virtuel . Net>
  • Re: port 81??
    From: "Billy Verreynne" <vslabs @ onwe . co . za>
  • Re: PIX and other "Black boxes" vs normal firewalls.
    From: Bruce Byrd <byrd @ internetdevices . com>
  • [no subject]
    From: Marc Dorando <mdorando @ argus . de>
  • TCP options and firewalls
    From: Peter Ford <peterf @ microsoft . com>
• Tuesday 14 October 1997
  • RE: POP across a firewlll...
    From: Glenn <glenn @ compfun . netkonect . co . uk>
  • Re: POP across a firewlll...
    From: Robert Roell <rob @ verio . net>
  • port 81??
    From: doconnell @ bigyellow . com
  • IIS behind firewall?
    From: "S. Fung" <s_fung @ hotmail . com>
  • Re: Promiscuous mode
    From: Bernd Eckenfels <lists @ lina . inka . de>
  • closing berkeley services
    From: Becki Kain <beckers @ josephus . furph . com>
  • sunrpc udp
    From: Doron Hasid <dorh @ nvt . netvision . net . il>
  • Database Manager Needed
    From: gbf @ dmc10 . com
  • RE: SAP Gateway
    From: "Davidson, Grover" <Grover . Davidson @ anheuser-busch . com>
  • Secure Logon System for Windows NT
    From: Dennis Nwaigbo <dnwaig @ ctp . com>
  • VPNs and Windows95/NT clients
    From: Bret Robinson <brobinso @ atsi . com>
  • RE: SAP Gateway
    From: Patrick Prue <PatrickP @ FANTOM . COM>
  • PIX FTP hanging at 99%
    From: Rakesh Bharania <rbharani @ cisco . com>
  • Disable port 137/138
    From: "Jerry Edmiston" <jle9 @ eci-esyst . com>
  • RE: Promiscuous mode
    From: Bob Resino <pnh1rgr @ mclo10 . med . navy . mil>
  • Esthon F Medeiros/Brazil/IBM is out of the office.
    From: d24bml02/24/M/IBM @ br . ibm . com
  • Re: POP across a firewlll...
    From: Marek Kubita <marek @ corpus . cz>
  • Re: PIX and other "Black boxes" vs normal firewalls.
    From: "Narednik" <narednik @ worldnet . att . net>
  • [no subject]
    From: SHOCK9881 @ duq3 . cc . duq . edu
  • Re: Installing a firewall
    From: "travis" <wardt @ flash . net>
• Monday 13 October 1997
  • Installing a firewall
    From: Ryan Bullock <ryan @ io . com>
  • Re: Internet email security & r
    From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker @ imc . org>
  • RE: Keyword filtering of email through firewall
    From: John Whittaker <john @ credo . net>
  • Re: Promiscuous mode
    From: "Luke Gill" <lukeg @ ibm . net>
  • BIG linux problem.
    From: "travis" <wardt @ flash . net>
  • Re: Promiscuous mode
    From: Bernd Eckenfels <lists @ lina . inka . de>
  • (no subject)
    From: Silvina Di Como <nano @ cvtci . com . ar>
  • firewall-I and eliashim antivirus
    From: Arjan van der Valk <avdvalk @ neth . hp . com>
  • Re: Radius for Firewall-1 3.0
    From: Brian Betterton <brian_betterton @ INS . COM>
  • Re: PIX : big FTP downloads stop a 99% (side-tracked a little)
    From: ccurtis @ facm . fit . edu
  • re: FW-1 and ICMP (lack of) statefulness
    From: Bill Burns <shadow @ netscape . com>
  • Re: To Gauntlet or not to Gauntlet
    From: Frederick M Avolio <avolio @ tis . com>
  • Re: Firewall routing setup, Solaris 2.5.1
    From: Security Mail list <firewall @ corefacts . co . uk>
  • Re: DNS on the Firewall - security problem
    From: Gaddy Gumbao <succesor @ mnl . sequel . net>
  • Re: my Promiscuous mode query
    From: Rik Hemsley <hemsleyr @ keyline . co . uk>
  • Promiscuous mode
    From: Rik Hemsley <hemsleyr @ keyline . co . uk>
  • Radius for Firewall-1 3.0
    From: "Denis Koo N.C." <denis . koo @ hkcg . com>
  • Re: Single point of failure.
    From: "Greg Barnes" <greg @ ou812 . com>
  • (no subject)
    From: leen seung jin <howard7 @ halla2 . dacom . co . kr>
  • Reply
    From: mgm @ metronet . de
• Sunday 12 October 1997
  • Re: SAP Gateway
    From: Bernd Eckenfels <lists @ lina . inka . de>
  • 'Beta Test' Your Own Virtual Community
    From: MET <marketetc @ ultramailweb . com>
  • Re: DNS on the Firewall - security problem
    From: Aleph One <aleph1 @ dfw . net>
  • Re: DNS on the Firewall - security problem
    From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry @ piermont . com>
  • (no subject)
    From: PHuffman11 @ aol . com
  • Re: DNS on the Firewall - security problem
    From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
  • Re: NEW Security-Related List Server
    From: "Fred T. Langston" <fred @ networkcommerce . com>
  • Re: DNS on the Firewall - security problem
    From: Adam Shostack <adam @ homeport . org>
  • RE: Internet email security & r
    From: WALLY <wally @ microlan . com>
• Saturday 11 October 1997
  • [no subject]
    From: Paul Wick <ventura @ popmail . dircon . co . uk>
  • Re: To Gauntlet or not to Gauntlet
    From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
  • Re: PIX and other "Black boxes" vs normal firewalls.
    From: Emmanuel Yiu <e @ techie . com>
  • Re: PIX and other "Black boxes" vs normal firewalls.
    From: Lars Bertelsen <lbe @ login . dknet . dk>
  • Gauntlet and NTLM
    From: Richard Trott <trott @ remus . rutgers . edu>
  • Williamsburg Security Seminar -- Yet again....
    From: Chris Inskeep <inskeep_chris @ geologics . com>
  • Re: PIX and other "Black boxes" vs normal firewalls.
    From: "Mark Teicher" <mark-teicher @ worldnet . att . net>
  • PIX and other "Black boxes" vs normal firewalls.
    From: David Lang <dlang @ diginsite . com>
• Friday 10 October 1997
  • Re: DNS on the Firewall - security problem
    From: Cary Conover <carydc @ why . net>
  • (no subject)
    From: Salvador Fernández Barquín <salvador @ netspace . com . mx>
  • Re: DNS on the Firewall - security problem
    From: "David Harvey-George" <david @ threewiz . demon . co . uk>
  • Re: Java & Java Script
    From: "David Harvey-George" <david @ threewiz . demon . co . uk>
  • Re:
    From: Salvador Fernández Barquín <sferbar @ acnet . net>
  • IE 4.0
    From: dcostello @ cmol . com
  • Re: DNS on the Firewall - security problem
    From: Alfred Huger <ahuger @ silence . secnet . com>
  • no subject
    From: Justface @ aol . com
  • RE: Content Vector Protocol - Interest
    From: "Heisner, Jeff" <HeisnerJ @ nasd . com>
  • your signature file
    From: "Franco RUGGIERI" <fruggieri @ selfin . net>
  • Re: To Gauntlet or not to Gauntlet
    From: Ryan Russell/SYBASE <Ryan . Russell @ sybase . com>
  • Re:RE: Keyword filtering of email through firewall
    From: mbeech @ csc . ragroup . co . uk
  • Re: To Gauntlet or not to Gauntlet
    From: Ian Poynter <ian @ jerboa . com>
  • Re: hosts.allow
    From: Yash Khemani <yash @ teczar . com>
  • To Gauntlet or not to Gauntlet
    From: "Messano, Jim" <jim . messano @ lmco . com>
  • Content Vector Protocol - was Re: Keyword filtering of email through firewall
    From: John Lines <John . Lines @ aeat . co . uk>
  • Re: DNS on the Firewall - security problem
    From: Adam Shostack <adam @ homeport . org>
  • Re: POP across a firewlll...
    From: Ralf Thomas Klar <klar @ mkm . de>
  • Re: POP across a firewlll...
    From: "Santi Ribas - Brown's Operating System Services" <santi @ browns . co . uk>
  • Your Own Software Business
    From: 73266932 @ lanka . com
  • Re: POP across a firewlll...
    From: jon tobin <dyabolyk @ columbia . digiweb . com>
  • Re: System Spec for Penetration test
    From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
  • [no subject]
    From: David Lang <dlang @ diginsite . com>
• Thursday 09 October 1997
  • Re: Single point of failure.
    From: Andy Howard <achowar @ erenj . com>
  • Log Analyser
    From: Alessandro Jannuzzi <jannuzzi @ csn . com . br>
  • no subject
    From: Justface @ aol . com
  • RE: The risk management system mentioned below...
    From: Information Security <guy @ panix . com>
  • Re: Plug Help
    From: "Joseph S. D. Yao" <jsdy @ cospo . osis . gov>
  • Signing off for a bit ...
    From: Chris Wall <cwall @ on . com>
  • Re: System Spec for Penetration test
    From: Adam Shostack <adam @ homeport . org>
  • Looking for feedback on SCC Firewalls
    From: Bill Stout <stoutb @ pios . com>
  • RE: Keyword filtering of email through firewall
    From: "Davis, Rob" <rdavis @ lucentncg . com>
  • Re: System Spec for Penetration test
    From: Arjan Vos <arjan @ pino . demon . nl>
  • PIX : big FTP downloads stop a 99% (side-tracked a little)
    From: Anthony Burow <aburow @ gil . com . au>
  • RE: System Spec for Penetration test
    From: "Waegner.Rick" <RWaegner @ hou . mdc . com>
  • Single point of failure.
    From: bjm @ fl . dk
  • Re: Firewall routing setup, Solaris 2.5.1
    From: Brian Betterton <brian_betterton @ INS . COM>
  • Firewalls-Digest V6 #482 -Reply
    From: David Lane <dlane @ mantech . com>
  • Firewalls-Digest V6 #475 -Reply
    From: David Lane <dlane @ mantech . com>
  • Firewalls-Digest V6 #471 -Reply
    From: David Lane <dlane @ mantech . com>
  • Firewalls-Digest V6 #469 -Reply
    From: David Lane <dlane @ mantech . com>
  • DNS on the Firewall - security problem
    From: Marc Heuse <Marc . Heuse @ mail . DeuBa . COM>
  • Firewalls-Digest V6 #479 -Reply
    From: David Lane <dlane @ mantech . com>
  • Re: POP across a firewlll...
    From: "Santi Ribas - Brown's Operating System Services" <santi @ browns . co . uk>
  • Firewalls-Digest V6 #470 -Reply
    From: David Lane <dlane @ mantech . com>
  • [no subject]
    From: "B.Stoltefu " <b . stoltefuss @ westlb . de>
  • Firewalls-Digest V6 #478 -Reply
    From: David Lane <dlane @ mantech . com>
  • Firewalls-Digest V6 #481 -Reply
    From: David Lane <dlane @ mantech . com>
  • Firewalls-Digest V6 #476 -Reply
    From: David Lane <dlane @ mantech . com>
  • Firewalls-Digest V6 #477 -Reply
    From: David Lane <dlane @ mantech . com>
  • Re: POP across a firewlll...
    From: Andrew M Forster <forster @ peg . apc . org>
  • Re: The risk management system mentioned below...
    From: Information Security <guy @ panix . com>
• Wednesday 08 October 1997
  • adding a rule on firewall1
    From: High Mercury <merc @ icanect . net>
  • RE: Firewall-1, packet -VS- Proxy
    From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
  • Re: System Spec for Penetration test
    From: Anton J Aylward <anton @ Toronto . com>
  • Firewall routing setup, Solaris 2.5.1
    From: Dave Zwieback <zwieback_dave @ timeplex . com>
  • Re: System Spec for Penetration test
    From: "Gary O. Abrams" <gabrams @ geek . advsys . com>
  • System Spec for Penetration test
    From: Phil Cracknell <phil @ securIT . net>
  • Re: POP across a firewlll...
    From: Ed Forbes <ejf @ bbnplanet . com>
  • Re: Internet email security & reliability
    From: Information Security <guy @ panix . com>
  • RE: Internet email security & r
    From: Information Security <guy @ panix . com>
  • POP across a firewlll...
    From: "Sadler, Connie J" <csadler @ arkons . lmsc . lockheed . com>
  • R: Firewall-1, packet -VS- Proxy
    From: "Franco RUGGIERI" <fruggieri @ selfin . net>
  • Re: Internet email security & r
    From: Andy Howard <achowar @ erenj . com>
  • NAT
    From: Oliver Korfmacher <okorf @ netcs . com>
  • RE: Internet email security & r
    From: "Caldwell, Matt" <caldwm @ xgate . columbiasc . ncr . com>
  • Re: VPNs and PPTP
    From: "Billy Verreynne" <vslabs @ onwe . co . za>
  • Re: VPNs and PPTP
    From: mfeinstein @ newoak . com (Michael G. Feinstein)
  • OpenStep
    From: kozmando <kozmando @ magpage . com>
  • RE: Internet email security & r
    From: Joseph Judge <joej @ joesmac . ultranet . com>
• Tuesday 07 October 1997
  • Re[2]: VPNs and PPTP
    From: dbovee @ scitor . com (David Bovee)
  • Re: Internet email security & r
    From: dbovee @ scitor . com (David Bovee)
  • PIX Firewall and DNS
    From: "Alberto U. Begliomini" <aub @ sirius . com>
  • Internet email security & r
    From: "David Glosser" <glosser @ bbdo . com>
  • Security Show
    From: Tim Shoemaker <tshoemaker @ normandev . com>
  • RE: hosts.allow
    From: "Henry W. Farkas" <hfarkas @ d5664655 . ims . advantis . com>
  • RE: VPNs and PPTP
    From: "Bowers T (Thomas) at MSXSSC" <TB186459 @ shellus . com>
  • RE: what ports to pass for exchange/outlook
    From: Bill Stout <stoutb @ pios . com>
  • Re: Gauntlet, VPN/WAN/Dialups
    From: Christopher Michael <cm @ rmsbus . com>
  • RE: VPNs and PPTP
    From: "H. Morrow Long" <morrow . long @ yale . edu>
  • RE: Multi-interface firewalls
    From: James Terry <james . terry @ imx-exchange . com>
  • RE: hosts.allow
    From: Andy Lewis <alewis @ mpsi . net>
  • Registration
    From: "Maxim_Kotliarov" <danceman @ chat . ru>
  • Registration
    From: "Maxim_Kotliarov" <danceman @ chat . ru>
  • [no subject]
    From: Jamie Pratcher <jamie @ s-1 . com>
  • RE: Multi-interface firewalls
    From: WALLY <wally @ microlan . com>
  • RE: Firewall-1, packet -VS- Proxy
    From: "Engasser, Charlie" <Engasser @ JS-JTF . AF . MIL>
  • RE: Gauntlet, VPN/WAN/Dialups
    From: WALLY <wally @ microlan . com>
  • RE: hosts.allow
    From: "Caldwell, Matt" <caldwm @ xgate . columbiasc . ncr . com>
  • Re: dynamic address translation...
    From: Eric Vyncke <evyncke @ cisco . com>
  • Re: Multi-interface firewalls
    From: Mike Jones <mike . jones @ unifiedtech . com>
  • Re: Multi-interface firewalls
    From: Peter Enderborg <pme @ abnamro-software . com>
  • RE: VPNs and PPTP
    From: Russ <Russ . Cooper @ rc . on . ca>
  • RE: what ports to pass for exchange/outlook
    From: Russ <Russ . Cooper @ rc . on . ca>
  • [no subject]
    From: Paulo Augusto Rosa <par @ ime . usp . br>
  • Re: Multi-interface firewalls
    From: Nobuhiko Yoshimoto <yoshi @ koto . nikkei . co . jp>
  • Multi-interface firewalls
    From: Peter Enderborg <pme @ abnamro-software . com>
  • Re: Gauntlet, VPN/WAN/Dialups
    From: Steve Kruse <jsk347 @ worldnet . att . net>
  • Split DNS question
    From: "Paquette, Trevor" <TrevorPaquette @ mcc . net>
• Monday 06 October 1997
  • Gauntlet, VPN/WAN/Dialups
    From: Brian Tackett <cym @ acrux . net>
  • RE: Firewall-1, packet -VS- Proxy
    From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
  • RE: Firewall-1, packet -VS- Proxy
    From: Frederick M Avolio <avolio @ tis . com>
  • RE: Info
    From: "Maung, Than" <maungt @ BRAGG . ARMY . MIL>
  • dynamic address translation...
    From: Ciaran Deignan <deignan @ frec . bull . fr>
  • Re: Microsoft vs The world (apology)
    From: "Mark Teicher" <mark-teicher @ worldnet . att . net>
  • RE: Firewall-1, packet -VS- Proxy
    From: "Engasser, Charlie" <Engasser @ JS-JTF . AF . MIL>
  • RE: Three way firewall wanted
    From: "Maung, Than" <maungt @ BRAGG . ARMY . MIL>
  • Info
    From: Craig . Penton @ kpmg . co . uk (Craig Penton)
  • MS Windows and their security status
    From: Chris Brenton <cbrenton @ pccmis . com>
  • RE: Microsoft vs The world (apology)
    From: Gary Crumrine <gcrum @ us-state . gov>
  • Re: Audio Electronic Engineering
    From: "Jeremy D. Zawodny" <zawodny @ hou . moc . com>
  • Re: Please help - Linux anon FTP
    From: "Jeremy D. Zawodny" <zawodny @ hou . moc . com>
  • Re: hosts.allow
    From: "Jeremy D. Zawodny" <zawodny @ hou . moc . com>
  • Re:Williamsburg Security Seminar
    From: STEVE . CONNOLLY @ arpstl-emh2 . army . mil
  • (no subject)
    From: Benjamin Brumaire <brumaire @ arcor . net>
  • Re: VLANs for Security Inside the Firewall
    From: Eric Vyncke <evyncke @ cisco . com>
  • [no subject]
    From: Adam Threadgold <support @ netbenefit . co . uk>
  • [no subject]
    From: Adam Threadgold <support @ netbenefit . co . uk>
  • Re: Just wondering - pipeline computer firewalls?
    From: Richard Reno <rreno @ carsinfo . com>
  • Three way firewall wanted
    From: LISTS @ aik . tec . sc . us
• Sunday 05 October 1997
  • firewall-wizards mailing list...
    From: "Rebar - Lawrence J. Rebarchik" <rebar @ ins . com>
  • Need Vendors for Williamsburg Conference
    From: Chris Inskeep <inskeep_chris @ geologics . com>
  • Re: SNA/IBM Security
    From: Bill Husler <Bill @ Husler . xo . com>
  • re: hosts.allow
    From: Antonio Paulo Salgado Forster <forster @ na-cp . rnp . br>
  • Re: R: Firewall-1, packet -VS- Proxy
    From: Ryan Russell/SYBASE <Ryan . Russell @ sybase . com>
  • Re: VLANs for Security Inside the Firewall
    From: Bill Husler <Bill @ Husler . xo . com>
  • 1 DNS
    From: Gaddy Gumbao <succesor @ mnl . sequel . net>
  • no subject
    From: Justface @ aol . com
  • Re: Firewalls-Digest V6 #471
    From: Gaddy Gumbao <succesor @ mnl . sequel . net>
  • Proxying Citrix WinFrame? (fwd)
    From: elroy <elroy @ kcstar . com>
  • SNA/IBM Security
    From: Sami Mousa <sami_mousa @ INS . COM>
  • NTS - Windows NT Security, Event Log Management and UpTime reporting
    From: Craig Keegan <ckeegan @ scullin . starway . net . au>
  • Re: Tunneling IPX.
    From: Steve Kruse <jsk347 @ worldnet . att . net>
  • Re: R: Firewall-1, packet -VS- Proxy
    From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
  • Your Home And Family
    From: webbs @ tds . net
  • R: Firewall-1, packet -VS- Proxy
    From: "Franco RUGGIERI" <fruggieri @ selfin . net>
  • RE: Tunneling IPX.
    From: Kim Wohlert <Kim . Wohlert @ mainz . dk>
  • FW: Software for testing a firewall
    From: "Boac, Lito" <jvboac @ dammam . ingr . com>
  • FW: Software for testing a firewall
    From: "Boac, Lito" <jvboac @ dammam . ingr . com>
  • (no subject)
    From: liu jun <ga97001 @ public . js . hb . cn>
• Saturday 04 October 1997
  • Re: RFC Index?
    From: Hugo Leonardo Wolff Souza <hugo @ aleph . com . br>
  • SINUS Firewall
    From: Al Potter <apotter @ lwby-85ppp63 . epix . net>
  • [no subject]
    From: "Matrix Venus" <mave @ hotmail . com>
  • Re: Just wondering - pipeline computer firewalls?
    From: Sick Puppy <sikpuppy @ maestro . maestro . com>
  • [no subject]
    From: "Ayal S. Bida" <asb @ ican . net>
  • Tunneling IPX.
    From: Dick Brooks <dick @ tech-comm . com>
  • [no subject]
    From: Bob Bryant <rbryant @ gte . com>
  • Re: hosts.allow
    From: "Chris Brenton" <cbrenton @ pccmis . com>
  • Firewall-1, packet -VS- Proxy
    From: Dave Elfering <elfering @ tconl . com>
  • Please help - Linux anon FTP
    From: Nathan Zych - ML <maillist @ hv . nws . net>
  • Re: registering port numbers for software?
    From: Paul Ferguson <ferguson @ cisco . com>
• Friday 03 October 1997
  • Audio Electronic Engineering
    From: Brian Nunes <phloyd @ cyberjunkie . com>
  • registering port numbers for software?
    From: Joshua Rabinowitz <joshr @ joshr . com>
  • hosts.allow
    From: Andy Lewis <alewis @ mpsi . net>
  • Re: TCP Ports
    From: Bill Stout <stoutb @ pios . com>
  • RFC Index?
    From: jon tobin <dyabolyk @ columbia . digiweb . com>
  • Re: TCP Ports
    From: Chris Lonvick <clonvick @ cisco . com>
  • Re: TCP Ports
    From: Daniel Mavrakis <mavrakis @ ares . mctel . fr>
  • TCP Ports
    From: Stephen McLarey <smclarey @ on . com>
  • Re: TCP Ports
    From: Brian Betterton <brian_betterton @ INS . COM>
  • Re: IE 4 security hole?
    From: "Jeremy D. Zawodny" <zawodny @ hou . moc . com>
  • Re: TCP Ports
    From: Scott Lupfer <scott . lupfer @ ssds . com>
  • Re: TCP Ports
    From: Brian Tackett <cym @ acrux . net>
  • Re: TCP Ports
    From: "Jeremy D. Zawodny" <zawodny @ hou . moc . com>
  • [no subject]
    From: pawlik @ comarch . pl
  • Re: TCP Ports
    From: Lee Mann <lmann @ uucom . com>
  • [no subject]
    From: "Melford John" <mjohn @ clyde . roehampton . ac . uk>
  • Re: Plug Help
    From: mgetter @ advstaff . com
  • IE 4 security hole?
    From: Phil Glatz <phil @ glatz . com>
  • [no subject]
    From: "Ayal S. Bida" <asb @ ican . net>
  • TCP Ports
    From: mbeech @ csc . ragroup . co . uk
  • (no subject)
    From: "ga97001 @ public . js . hb . cn" <ga97001 @ public . js . hb . cn>
  • Re: Just wondering - pipeline computer firewalls?
    From: Anton J Aylward <anton @ Toronto . com>
  • Plug Help
    From: Gregory Wilkins <greg @ wye . com>
  • Firewalls BoF at Interop
    From: Frederick M Avolio <avolio @ tis . com>
  • Re: Williamsburg Security Seminar
    From: gary flynn <gary @ habanero . jmu . edu>
  • Re: what ports to pass for exchange/outlook
    From: Noam Rathaus <dolittle @ israelmail . com>
  • [no subject]
    From: Jens Askengren <ing9705 @ ind . mh . se>
  • Re: Milkyway SecurIT - what for?
    From: "David Harvey-George" <david @ threewiz . demon . co . uk>
  • Re: Just wondering - pipeline computer firewalls?
    From: "Billy Verreynne" <vslabs @ onwe . co . za>
  • Re: Re: Milkyway SecurIT - what for?
    From: Brian Mitchell <brian @ firehouse . net>
  • Re: Re: Milkyway SecurIT - what for?
    From: Colin Campbell <sgcccdc @ citec . qld . gov . au>
  • [no subject]
    From: "Matrix Venus" <mave @ hotmail . com>
  • Just wondering - pipeline computer firewalls?
    From: Sick Puppy <sikpuppy @ maestro . maestro . com>
  • RE: High Availability between two HPUX 10.20 FW1 machines
    From: mdb @ dosmanos . cwiz . com (Martin D. Baldenegro)
• Thursday 02 October 1997
  • Encryption future?
    From: Bill Stout <stoutb @ pios . com>
  • RE: what ports to pass for exchange/outlook
    From: Alex Fournier <afournie @ tactik . com>
  • Free plug daemon.
    From: Peter da Silva <peter @ baileynm . com>
  • Protecting Novell Servers
    From: Peter Morissey <ppmorris @ syr . edu>
  • Re: Fire Wall Checklist?
    From: Hugo Leonardo Wolff Souza <hugo @ aleph . com . br>
  • Security Seminars
    From: sarah_mcardle @ csg . stercomm . com
  • Re: Milkyway SecurIT - what for?
    From: "Michael C. Richardson" <mcr @ sandelman . ottawa . on . ca>
  • Re: !NSA, Call for Papers
    From: Bill Stout <stoutb @ pios . com>
  • SAP Gateway
    From: "Davidson, Grover" <Grover . Davidson @ anheuser-busch . com>
  • Re: Milkyway SecurIT - what for?
    From: Hung Vu <hungvu @ milkyway . com>
  • Any suggestions?
    From: "HuangMin(Tunny)" <hmin @ public . cq . sc . cn>
  • Re: Firewalls on NT
    From: Richard Dodson <rdodson @ wwa . com>
  • RE: Re: Milkyway SecurIT - what for?
    From: Brian Mitchell <brian @ firehouse . net>
  • RE: what ports to pass for exchange/outlook
    From: Robert Ståhlbrand <robert . stahlbrand @ nmac . ericsson . se>
  • Fire Wall Checklist?
    From: Andy Lewis <alewis @ mpsi . net>
  • Firewalls-Digest V6 #473 -Reply
    From: BILL LOWRY <blowry @ balch . com>
  • RE: Downfalls of Proxy Server?
    From: "Jeremy D. Zawodny" <zawodny @ hou . moc . com>
  • Re: Does Winframe need a firewall?
    From: "Greg Collins" <gcollins @ dqisystems . com>
  • RE: Re: Milkyway SecurIT - what for?
    From: manuel . ricca @ pararede . pt
  • PPTP and STEELHEAD
    From: Robert Ståhlbrand <robert . stahlbrand @ nmac . ericsson . se>
  • what ports to pass for exchange/outlook
    From: khearn <khearn @ gte . net>
  • Software for testing a firewall
    From: "Boac, Lito" <jvboac @ dammam . ingr . com>
  • RE: SMTP VRFY (was: Microsoft vs The world)
    From: Ned Freed <Ned . Freed @ innosoft . com>
  • Re: Firewalls-Digest V6 #472
    From: Seacol Chin <schin @ mobile . global . slb . com>
  • Re: High Availability between two HPUX 10.20 FW1 machines
    From: Cihan Subasi <csubasi @ garanti . com . tr>
  • [no subject]
    From: "Denis Koo N.C." <denis . koo @ hkcg . com>
  • Firewalls-Digest V6 #472 -Reply
    From: BILL LOWRY <blowry @ balch . com>
  • RE: Checkpoint and FWTK 1.2 ftp proxy hangs
    From: Rick Murphy <rick @ paimail . com>
  • Re: Firewalls-Digest V6 #471
    From: msrao @ mtu . edu
• Wednesday 01 October 1997
  • RE: Microsoft vs The world (apology)
    From: Stephen Greenwalt <StephenG @ DENVERSYS . COM>
  • [no subject]
    From: Emmanouil Magos <athena . compulink . gr @ compulink . gr>
  • RE: Security Plan/Policy
    From: "Gasparini, Edy" <GASPARIE @ anz . com>
  • [no subject]
    From: Ken Jones <kenj @ gblhorizon . com>
  • Re: High Availability between two HPUX 10.20 FW1 machines
    From: Scot Anderson <scot @ btg . com>
  • RE: PC-Anywhere - Custom Protocol?
    From: "Paquette, Trevor" <TrevorPaquette @ mcc . net>
  • Re: Milkyway SecurIT - what for?
    From: Alfred Huger <huger @ silence . secnet . com>
  • RE: EE Times Article
    From: Leonard Miyata <leonard @ geminisecure . com>
  • Re: A question about x-gw
    From: Rick Murphy <rick @ paimail . com>
  • RE: Downfalls of Proxy Server?
    From: "Zilber, Alexey" <AZilber @ usanetworks . com>
  • Which Firewall
    From: Scott Roberts <scottrob @ mediaone . net>
  • Java & Java Script
    From: "Amy (Cremer) Briggs" <amyc @ libofmich . lib . mi . us>
  • Re: Finding a wiretap or NIC card with a TDR
    From: "Conrad Minor" <minorc @ reston . ans . net>
  • Cyberguard and Gauntlet
    From: Terry Dugan <tmdugan @ compuserve . com>
  • [no subject]
    From: Jamie Pratcher <jamie @ s-1 . com>
  • Re: split dns - bind 4
    From: Peter da Silva <peter @ baileynm . com>
  • Re: Radius
    From: john kerr <jkerr2 @ csc . com>
  • Re: Firewalls-Digest V6 #471
    From: Gary Bryant <bryant @ southconn . com>
  • Re: firewall evaluation
    From: Sami Mousa <sami_mousa @ INS . COM>
  • SPAM filters on Raptor
    From: Jeffrey Porter <jporter @ verio . net>
  • Firewalls-Digest V6 #471 -Reply
    From: BILL LOWRY <blowry @ balch . com>
  • Williamsburg Security Seminar
    From: Chris Inskeep <inskeep_chris @ geologics . com>
  • FW-1 and Hypercom's NMS protocol
    From: Gaddy Gumbao <succesor @ mnl . sequel . net>
  • [no subject]
    From: Dunarea Textil <dunarea @ kappa . ro>
  • [no subject]
    From: "Jens-Erik Hansen" <jens @ gis . de>
  • [no subject]
    From: Ulrich Böttger <uboettger @ cscploenzke . de>
  • Firewalls on NT
    From: "Jan Zeilinga" <j . zeilinga @ abm . com . au>
  • Re: Raptor VPN and Port 420
    From: Rick Murphy <rick @ paimail . com>
  • Re: This List, Hummmmm....
    From: C Matthew Curtin <cmcurtin @ research . megasoft . com>
  • Re: Radius
    From: Tim Basher <basher @ alpha . CES . CWRU . Edu>
  • RE: Checkpoint and FWTK 1.2 ftp proxy hangs
    From: Joseph Judge <joej @ joesmac . ultranet . com>
  • Re: Public/Private DNS
    From: Richard Pouncy <prc @ rtscomp . com>
  • Re: Red Beard's Network Flight Recorder
    From: Sick Puppy <sikpuppy @ maestro . maestro . com>
  • Re: PIX : big FTP downloads stop a 99%
    From: Joseph Iacovelli <wolfboy @ earthlink . net>
  • Re: Netbeui and SSH
    From: Bernd Eckenfels <lists @ lina . inka . de>
  • Re: Red Beard's Network Flight Recorder
    From: Bernd Eckenfels <lists @ lina . inka . de>
  • Re: Finding a wiretap or NIC card with a TDR
    From: Sick Puppy <sikpuppy @ maestro . maestro . com>
  • [no subject]
    From: "Michael " <bakerm @ magna . com . au>
  • Re: Netbeui and SSH
    From: David Lang <dlang @ diginsite . com>
• Tuesday 30 September 1997
  • RE: 10.10.30.30
    From: Anton J Aylward <anton @ Toronto . com>
  • Re: snmp broadcasts
    From: Stephen McLarey <smclarey @ on . com>
  • Re: VPNs and PPTP
    From: Peter da Silva <peter @ baileynm . com>
  • Re: snmp broadcasts
    From: dmurphy @ cwa . com (Dan Murphy x286)
  • RE: SMTP VRFY (was: Microsoft vs The world)
    From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker @ brandenburg . com>
  • Question
    From: "steven.j.schulze" <steven . j . schulze @ ac . com>
  • Re: Solaris v. NT Performance (FW-1)
    From: Peter da Silva <peter @ baileynm . com>
  • High Availability between two HPUX 10.20 FW1 machines
    From: "Schlueter, Ian" <Ian . Schlueter @ avnet . com>
  • Re: Solaris v. NT Performance (FW-1)
    From: "Franklin R. Jones" <grat @ frii . com>
  • Which Firewall?
    From: Scott Roberts <scottrob @ mediaone . net>
  • Re: Does Winframe need a firewall?
    From: Eric Vyncke <evyncke @ cisco . com>
  • Re: Ascend's Secure Access Firewall
    From: Alex Hutton <Alex @ Progressive-Systems . com>
  • Re: Blocking spam mail (was: about sendmail security)
    From: Anton J Aylward <anton @ Toronto . com>
  • A question about x-gw
    From: ralf <R . Allrutz @ science-computing . de>
  • Re: Haystack Stalker
    From: Jody Patilla <jcp @ tis . com>
  • no subject
    From: Dsmgmt @ aol . com
  • RE: Ascend's Secure Access Firewall - Failures
    From: Mike Adams <madams @ orca . net>
  • Downfalls of Proxy Server?
    From: john kerr <jkerr2 @ csc . com>
  • Re: Finding a wiretap or NIC card with a TDR
    From: dharris @ kcp . com
  • Re: VLANs for Security Inside the Firewall
    From: Eric Vyncke <evyncke @ cisco . com>
  • Re: VLANs for Security Inside the Firewall
    From: Michael Ferioli <ferioli @ comnet . com . tr>
• Tuesday 23 September 1997
  • two questions!
    From: Jose Luis Delgado <jdelgado @ nexus . net . mx>

Other Indexes

• Previous month (September 1997)
• Next month (November 1997)
• This month, indexed by thread