Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(October 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
From: Ryan Russell/SYBASE <Ryan . Russell @ sybase . com>
Date: 26 Oct 97 8:31:46 EDT
To: proberts <proberts . clark . . net @ sybase . com>
Cc: firewalls <firewalls @ greatcircle . com>

They can can and do protect from the OOB bug.  Now, you might
have a legitimate complaint in that Checkpoint didn't do that until
after the attack was discovered.

    Ryan

-------------------------------------------------------------------------




I think you're missing the point completely here.  What a packet filter
doesn't do is rewrite what are 'legitimate' packets at the transport
layer.  Modifying portions of a packet isn't the same as rewriting it.

For instance, a packet filter won't protect an NT 4.0 base computer from OOB
attacks, and still allow a Solaris one to function.  You _have_ to upgrade
every "protected" machine or deny legitimate OOB packets.  Proxies simply
don't have that problem, fix the gateway and the problem immediately
disappears.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Robertson      "My statements in this message are personal opinions
proberts @
 clark .
 net      which may have no basis whatsoever in fact."
                                                                     PSB#9280





Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Algorithmically derived passwords
From: Kogula Palan <palank @ pc . jaring . my>
Next: Re: Algorithmically derived passwords
From: Ryan Russell/SYBASE <Ryan . Russell @ sybase . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: RE: sex, lies, and firewall code
From: Jeromie Jackson <jeromie @ garrison . com>
Next: Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com