Firewalls: Re: sex, lies, and firewall code

Firewalls
(October 1997)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
From:	Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
Date:	Wed, 29 Oct 1997 17:03:24 +1100 (EDT)
To:	proberts @ clark . net (Paul D. Robertson)
Cc:	ryanr @ sybase . com, firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to:	<Pine . LNX . 3 . 91 . 971026120912 . 2275D-100000 @ gargoyle> from "Paul D. Robertson" at Oct 26, 97 12:17:19 pm

In some mail from Paul D. Robertson, sie said:
> 
> The initial Checkpoint reaction was "Block all OOB packets", obviously 
> breaking FTP and Telnet functionality.

Add rlogin to that too.

References:

Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	Re: Are there problems by Windows NT server? From: Stepken <stepken @ edina . xnc . com>
Indexed By Date	Next:	Re: sex,lies, and application proxy based fw vs Check Point From: "Simon J. Gerraty" <sjg @ quick . com . au>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Re: sex, lies, and firewall code From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Re: sex, lies, and firewall code From: Anton J Aylward <anton @ Toronto . com>