Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(October 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
From: "Ryan Russell"<ryanr @ sybase . com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1997 20:52:26 -0800
To: avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au
Cc: proberts @ clark . net, firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM

I guess I should have been more explicit..

I mean, a source for the info about how FW1 first
handled the OOB problem.  I'm willing to believe
that rlogin uses OOB, without looking at the code. :)

                    Ryan






avalon @
 coombs .
 anu .
 edu .
 au on 10/29/97 04:00:33 PM

To:   Ryan Russell/SYBASE
cc:   proberts @
 clark .
 net, firewalls @
 GreatCircle .
 COM
Subject:  Re: sex, lies, and firewall code




In some mail from Ryan Russell, sie said:
>
> I haven't been able to find a reference that indicates that
> was the case.  Any pointers?
Can I suggest the rlogin/rlogind source code ?
> avalon @
 coombs .
 anu .
 edu .
 au on 10/28/97 10:03:24 PM
>
> To:   proberts @
 clark .
 net
> cc:   Ryan Russell/SYBASE, firewalls @
 GreatCircle .
 COM
> Subject:  Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
>
>
>
>
> In some mail from Paul D. Robertson, sie said:
> >
> > The initial Checkpoint reaction was "Block all OOB packets", obviously
> > breaking FTP and Telnet functionality.
> Add rlogin to that too.
>
>
>
>
>
>







Follow-Ups:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: AG and SPF differences
From: "Ryan Russell"<ryanr @ sybase . com>
Next: Feed Back
From: "larry" <hountz @ diningtable . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
Next: Re: sex, lies, and firewall code
From: Joe Loiacono <jloiacon @ csc . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com