Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(January 1998)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: SKIP question
From: Bret Robinson <brobinso @ atsi . com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 15:09:12 -0700
To: Gary . Wolfe @ Eng . Sun . COM
Cc: firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <Roam . SIMC . 2 . 0 . 6 . 884364445 . 17360 . wolfe @ basilisk> (Gary . Wolfe @ Eng . Sun . COM)
References: <Roam . SIMC . 2 . 0 . 6 . 884364445 . 17360 . wolfe @ basilisk>

> SunScreen EFS supports NAT. Can you NAT the internal hosts that have
> unregistrered IP addresses? 
> 

I would prefer not to have to do this, since we want to just use SKIP as
partner sites and not have to buy EFS - since we can run SKIP on Solaris
x86.

> 
> I would try NAT first. You could also use tunnel mode for both Win 95 SKIP and
> SUnScreen EFS. (Note: tunneling for WIN95 is available on latest release
> 12/27/97).
> 

We are running tunnel mode at both ends, but will check which version of
Win95 SKIP i am using. I downloaded the 512 key version on Jan 5/98.

Thanks, Bret

| Bret Robinson, Snr. System Admin    \       Voice: +1-403-213-8413        |
| Applied Terravision Systems, Inc.    \        Fax: +1-403-264-2122        | 
| Calgary, Alberta     Canada           \     Web site: www.atsi.com        |
| BRobinson @
 atsi .
 com                     \                                  |
|       "Keep your stick on the ice"      \___ o  <- puck (for US viewers)  |



References:
Indexed By Date Previous: RE: RE: Stateful Inspection Anyone? Session limits on state -tracking systems?
From: "Ryan Russell"<ryanr @ sybase . com>
Next: RE: relative strengths of different encyrption techniques
From: "Ryan Russell"<ryanr @ sybase . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: SKIP question
From: "Gary R. Wolfe" <Gary . Wolfe @ Eng . Sun . COM>
Next: IBM firewall
From: "Johan Teekens" <calculus @ pi . net>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com