Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(February 1998)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: http server for bastion host
From: Ming Lu <mlu @ privsys . gip . net>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 1998 13:45:18 -0500 (EST)
To: Marc Slemko <marcs @ znep . com>
Cc: Henry Hertz Hobbit <hhhobbit @ icarus . weber . edu>, Firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <Pine . BSF . 3 . 95 . 980201092321 . 18090E-100000 @ alive . znep . com>

Agree. One can restrict users access http bastion host/apache server by
creating ftp access only, using wu-ftpd, or on solaris 2.6, configure the 
anonymous ftp server (use solaris ftpd daemon) to accept ftp only access.

_ming

On Sun, 1 Feb 1998, Marc Slemko wrote:

->On Sun, 1 Feb 1998, Henry Hertz Hobbit wrote:
->
->> On Fri, 30 Jan 1998, Michael J. Maravillo wrote:
->> 
->> > On Thu, 29 Jan 1998, Henry Hollenberg wrote:
->> > 
->> > >I saw that the CERN http server was reccomended in Chapman and
->> > > Zwicky so started checking it out, but the first thing I read
->> > > knocked it:
->> > [...]
->> > >Should I look for something else.....they made it sound pretty
->> > > good in the book, cacheing and all.  Comments?
->> > 
->> > Get Apache... http://www.apache.org
->> 
->> You get what you pay for. If you also subscribe to the Bugtraq
->> mailing list, you immediately realize that Apache has it's share
->> of security holes. The price is lower, but so is the security level.
->> If this isn't a concern, then by all means go ahead and get it.
->> Apache makes an excellent product, and despite what I just said
->> they have been very good at patching any holes as they find them.
->> If you want a higher level of security I would advise that you
->> get a Netscape server. CERN's product was the first, and as always
->> with the first, getting the darn thing to work is a higher priority
->> than security. Netscape site:
->
->Huh?  Why exactly do you think Netscape's server is going to be magically
->secure and will have no security holes?  Because they don't go through and
->do security reviews of it and announce any problems they find publicly?
->Because the source isn't available so it is harder for people to find
->those holes?  I can give you a list of servers that have never had any
->security holes publicly announced.  If I spent some time, I could also
->give you a list of holes in most or all of them.
->
->There have been no general exploits found in the past year for Apache that
->can be exploited remotely without pre-existing access, and I suggest that
->if someone already has access to your bastion then Apache isn't your
->concern.
->
->Whatever server you run, you should run it chrooted.
->
->-- 
->     Marc Slemko     | Apache team member
->     marcs @
 znep .
 com  | marc @
 apache .
 org
->
->

============================================================================
Ming Lu                                             Email: mlu @
 hq .
 si .
 net
Network Tech Consulting Engineer                    Phone: 703-689-5290 (w)
Engineering Division                                       703-855-4194 (m)
Global One Telecommunications, LLT.                        703-689-6575 (f)
============================================================================  
"Do not pay attention to every word people say, or you may hear your
 servant cursing you ---- for you know in your heart that many times you
 yourself have cursed others."



References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: http server for bastion host
From: Ming Lu <mlu @ privsys . gip . net>
Next: Re: MS Proxy Server 2.0
From: "Chris Kostick" <christopher . t . kostick @ cpmx . saic . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: http server for bastion host
From: Marc Slemko <marcs @ znep . com>
Next: Re: http server for bastion host
From: Ming Lu <mlu @ privsys . gip . net>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com