Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(March 1998)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: RE: Re: Dial-up security breach?
From: Bates Dorene <batesd @ drum-emh4 . army . mil>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 1998 08:43:38 -0500
To: "'manuel . ricca @ pararede . pt'" <manuel . ricca @ pararede . pt>
Cc: "'firewalls @ greatcircle . com'" <firewalls @ greatcircle . com>

Not if the software load includes voice mail/fax capabilities (these are
the ones that come to mind rapidly).  These can and are set for
autoanswer and provide a real means for a hacker to access the box and
then the network connected to the box.


>----------
>From: 	manuel .
 ricca @
 pararede .
 pt[SMTP:manuel .
 ricca @
 pararede .
 pt]
>Sent: 	Tuesday, March 03, 1998 11:13 AM
>To: 	firewalls @
 greatcircle .
 com
>Subject: 	RE: Re: Dial-up security breach?
>
>
>
>They would have to be running a remote access server (such as RAS) wouldn't
>they?
>
>
>-----------------
>Manuel Ricca
>ParaRede - Tecnologias de Comunicacao, S.A.
>R. D. Constantino de Braganca, 12  1400 Lisboa  Portugal
>Tel: +351 1 3020451
>Fax: +351 1 3020444
>E-mail: manuel .
 ricca @
 pararede .
 pt
>
>
>-------------------
>From:   firewalls-owner @
 GreatCircle .
 COM
>To:   klinec @
 mapcoinc .
 com;Firewalls @
 greatcircle .
 com
>Cc:   
>Subject:   Re: Dial-up security breach?
>Date:   03-03-1998 00:30
>
>
>Horrible idea, most Windows95 users have at least one or two shared
>directories on their PCs, 99% of the time without any password level
>protection - it is trivial to access the contents of these directories via
>Netbios as your ISP is probably not filtering any traffic.
>
>--greg
>
>At 02:42 PM 2/27/98 -0600, klinec @
 mapcoinc .
 com wrote:
>>This is a little off-topic, but I thought I would try it anyway.
>>
>>We provide Internet access to 300 users enterprise-wide through our
>>frame-relay WAN connections and our firewall at our corporate headquarters.
>>Some users have decided to go out and get accounts with local ISPs and have
>>dial-up connections in Windows95 or Windows NT to these ISPs.  How much of
>>a security risk does everyone think this may be?  Since these users are
>>typically dynamically assigned an IP address when they log in to their ISP,
>>they then have TWO IP addresses on their system.  One for the network card
>>and one for the dial-up PPP connection.  Could an attacker use this
>>situation to attack our network?  How likely is this?
>>
>>We are trying to eradicate this from our network, but some of these users
>>are pretty stubborn.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Curtis Kline
>>Network System Engineer
>>MAPCO Coal, Inc.
>>Tulsa, OK
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>__________________________________________________________________
>
>Gregory Perry                                phone:  703.318.7134
>Trusted Computer Solutions, Inc.               fax:  703.318.5041
>13873 Park Center Road Suite 225        email: gperry @
 tcs-sec .
 com
>Herndon, VA  20171                         http://www.tcs-sec.com
>__________________________________________________________________
>

Indexed By Date Previous: Is configuring SOCKS4 possible with a Microsoft Proxy Server 2.0?
From: Martin Naskovski <genie @ imagesoft-technologies . com>
Next: Re: Infosec Accountability - 2 cents more
From: spaf @ cs . purdue . edu (Gene Spafford) (by way of Vin McLellan)
Indexed By Thread Previous: RE: Re: Dial-up security breach?
From: manuel . ricca @ pararede . pt
Next: RE: Dial-up security breach?
From: Michael Simonyi <msimonyi @ woodbridge . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com