There is an interesting paper "Securing Classical IP over ATM Networks"
which talks a bit about integrating firewalls into an ATM network. Have a
look at http://www.fwl.dfn.de/eng/team/cb/eng_natm/eng_natm.html
Laris
> ----------
> From: Pearce, Danny[SMTP:PEARCED @
tlpeh4 .
agw .
bt .
co .
uk]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 1998 9:30 AM
> To: limsks @
acapacific .
com .
sg; 'Greg Skafte'
> Cc: firewalls @
GreatCircle .
COM
> Subject: RE: ATM Firewall
>
>
> Checkpoint FW-1 doesn't firewall ATM cards - there is not security
> available
> on ATM as far as I am aware....
>
> > ----------
> > From: Greg Skafte[SMTP:skafte @
worldgate .
com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 1998 5:19 AM
> > To: limsks @
acapacific .
com .
sg
> > Cc: firewalls @
GreatCircle .
COM
> > Subject: Re: ATM Firewall
> >
> > could you not use Solaris Firewall 1 ( or Checkpoint Firewall 1) on a
> > ultra sparc ..... Solaris supports ATM cards and multiple interfaces
> > and the box would have
> >
> > Quoting limsks @
acapacific .
com .
sg (limsks @
acapacific .
com .
sg)
> > On Subject: ATM Firewall
> > Date: Wed, Mar 25, 1998 at 09:41:23AM +0000
> >
> > >
> > > hi there, do any of you out there have actually implement a ATM
> > > firewall before. It must support minimum 3 NIC cards.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thank u
> > >
> > > stuyv
> >
> > --
> > Email: skafte @
worldgate .
com Voice: +403 413 1910 Fax: +403 421 4929
> > #575 Sun Life Place * 10123 99 Street * Edmonton, AB * Canada * T5J
> 3H1
> >
> > -- --
> > When things can't get any worse, they simplify themselves by getting a
> > whole
> > lot worse then complicated. A complete and utter disaster is the
> simplest
> > thing in the world; it's preventing one that's complex. (Janet
> > Morris)
> >
>
|
|
