Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(April 1998)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Updated rfc1244?
From: Brian Macke <macke @ telegroup . com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 1998 16:01:23 -0600 (CST)
To: Roland Mueller <rmueller @ debis . com>
Cc: lpchiew @ pc . jaring . my, Firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <35209020 . 3535 @ debis . com>
Reply-to: bmacke @ telegroup . com

Damn.. all these resposes.. I thought I was the only one that actually
read the RFC. How many places actually use it as an SOP for their
envrinments?


On Tue, 31 Mar 1998, Roland Mueller wrote:

> griffin wrote:
> > 
> > Hi!
> > 
> > I remembered reading somewhere that the RFC1244
> > was to be replaced by a new rfc.  Anyone knows
> > what that is?
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> > Grif.
> You are right, the new site security handbook is RFC 2196
> regards
> Roland
> -- 
>  _________________________________________________________
>               Roland Mueller
>               Daimler-Benz AG
>               Bereich Datenschutz
>               HPC 0179
>               70546 Stuttgart
>               Tel. (+49) 711-972-2328     Fax. (+49) 711-972-1918
>               e-mail: rmueller @
 debis .
 com
> 

-Brian James Macke					macke @
 telegroup .
 com
 Unix SysAdmin/Security Specialist			Telegroup, Inc.
    "In order to get that which you wish for, you must first get that which 
     builds it."			-- Unknown


Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Laptop security / CMW variants
From: Vin McLellan <vin @ shore . net>
Next: Re: cable modem security
From: "Danny Johnson"<danny_johnson @ contcirc . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Laptop security / CMW variants
From: rkizer @ sddpc . org (Kizer, Randall)
Next: Re: Security Policy
From: amir . ameri @ zurich . com

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com