Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(April 1998)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: RE: FW-1 redundancy
From: "Edkins, Rob - Axon AKL" <edkinsr @ axon . co . nz>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 1998 15:57:11 +1200
To: "'Rick Murphy'" <rmurphy @ itm-inst . com>
Cc: Firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM

Sorry, put you wrong on the load balancing.

This refers to Checkpoint's ability to load balance among internal
server resources: eg a pool of identical http servers which are behind
the Checkpoint firewall.

The Synchronisation feature for high availability  does support
authentication, re-establishing connections if the primary module fails.

NB. Forgot to mention, you need Firewall 1 V3.0 for all this stuff.


> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Rick Murphy [SMTP:rmurphy @
 itm-inst .
 com]
> Sent:	Tuesday, March 31, 1998 2:07 PM
> To:	Edkins, Rob - Axon AKL
> Cc:	'Jose R. Ferreira'; Firewalls @
 GreatCircle .
 COM
> Subject:	RE: FW-1 redundancy
> 
> At 08:59 AM 3/31/98 +1200, Edkins, Rob - Axon AKL wrote:
> >Firewall 1 actually supports your intended configfuration quite
> happily
> >and will even load-balance across the 2 Firewalls! 
> 
> Does this load balancing work when you're using "security servers"?
> Authenticating HTTP? Doing virus scanning? Or is it only available
> when you're packet filtering? 
> 	-Rick

Indexed By Date Previous: RE: Intranet security products
From: "Edkins, Rob - Axon AKL" <edkinsr @ axon . co . nz>
Next: AW: Sniffer
From: "Berchtold Patrick (GIAPBE)" <giapbe @ gia . ch>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Intranet security products
From: "Paul M. Cardon" <pmarc @ cmg . fcnbd . com>
Next: FW: FW-1 redundancy
From: Ray Ricardo <ray . 06 @ worldnet . att . net>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com