Firewalls: Re: Livingston's IRX211 firewall router

Firewalls
(April 1998)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: Livingston's IRX211 firewall router
From:	Powertel Boca Ltd <natrajs @ pugmarks . whowho . com>
Date:	Sat, 11 Apr 1998 02:36:20 -0500 (CDT)
To:	Andrew Raphael <raphael @ research . canon . com . au>
Cc:	firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to:	<19980410074739 . 10935 . qmail @ cass . research . canon . com . au>

Hi 

Thanks Andrew. Apart from network address translation what are the other
benefits that you see in a Cisco PIX over the IRX211? , performance
benefits , that is .

Regards

Nataraj,S

On Fri, 10 Apr 1998, Andrew Raphael wrote:

> >Has anyone out there installed the IRX211 firewall route from Livingston .
> >How does the IRX211 compare with Cisco's PIX ?
> 
> Yes.  I use them as interior choke routers.  It's nothing like Cisco's
> PIX because it doesn't do network address translation.
> 
> -- 
> Andrew Raphael <raphael @
 research .
 canon .
 com .
 au>
> 	"Oh! I see, it's your birthday.  It's your big day, and I forgot."
>

References:

Re: Livingston's IRX211 firewall router
From: "Andrew Raphael" <raphael @ research . canon . com . au>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	Re: hi SPAM From: Ronald Wiplinger <ronald @ mail . trace . com . tw>
Indexed By Date	Next:	Re: hi SPAM From: Michael Conlen <meconlen @ intnet . net>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Re: Livingston's IRX211 firewall router From: "Andrew Raphael" <raphael @ research . canon . com . au>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Re: Livingston's IRX211 firewall router From: Josh Richards <jrichard @ livingston . com>