> What behaviour/header values have other people been asked for by their
> subscribers ??
We at Mailbase were asked for, and now provide, this feature ...
However, there are important feature differences:
1. It is an option, determined by the list owner, whether the Reply-To
field should contain the name of the list. The list owner can change
this at any time.
2. If a Reply-To field exists in the incoming message then one is not
added.
Thus a user still has the option to request a private response.
This is not a flame but I'm not sure I agree with removing Reply-To
headers from incoming mail, but then I dont suppose you are
contravening RFC822 so it is up to you.
Regards,
John
--
AKA: postmaster@mailbase.ac.uk
References:
|
|
