Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(April 1994)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Transient failures == lots of warnings
From: mcr @ spiff . ccs . carleton . ca (Michael Richardson)
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 94 14:37:05 EDT
To: woods @ ncar . UCAR . EDU
Cc: kjetilho @ ifi . uio . no, list-managers @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: Greg Woods's message of Mon, 11 Apr 94 7:50:02 MDT <199404111350.HAA04146@ncar.ucar.EDU>

  
  Most UUCP implementations provide for no-connection warnings. This
is usually implemented in the 'uucleanup' command, and is called from
uudemon.daily. This is a transport level thing, so it bounces queued
news as well as queued mail, and does not examine headers. The only
way I can see modifying that behaviour would be via a flag to uux, and
patches to sendmail/smail to allow choice of deliver agent based on
Priority: header.





References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Transient failures == lots of warnings
From: "Mark E. Mallett" <mem@mv.MV.COM>
Next: Re: Transient failures == lots of warnings
From: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Transient failures == lots of warnings
From: Dave Sill <de5@de5.CTD.ORNL.GOV>
Next: Re: Transient failures == lots of warnings
From: "Mark E. Mallett" <mem@mv.MV.COM>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com