Tom,
What would be the problem of sending received-undated messages
forward with a date as of when you handled them. This is not the
true date of origination, of course. You could even invent an
X-date-repaired-at: header comparable to the "Damaged in
transport" wrappers the snail mail postal service applies.
Notification that you had to repair the post could go back to
the originator, too.
Plan B: If you are willing to handle these manually, you can kick
undated messages into your "special handling" inbox from which
you can send them on as dated material. The volume is probably
low enough.
Plan C: Tell the users who bounce undated items to subscribe to
the digest.
Keith,
Has any thought been given to sending _forward_ repaired messages
by the Notary working group?
Al Gilman
asgilman@access.digex.net http://access.digex.net/~asgilman
References:
-
Date problems
From: Info-LabVIEW List Maintainer <info-labview-request@pica.army.mil>
|
|
