Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(January 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: AOL DNS troubles?
From: Chip Rosenthal <chip @ unicom . com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 1997 16:03:23 -0600 (CST)
To: brad @ his . com (Brad Knowles)
Cc: cmilam @ cap . af . mil (Milam Charles R. 1LT CAP), list-managers @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <v03007801aeec82c8748e@[205.177.25.174]> from "Brad Knowles" at Dec 29, 1996 03:24:38 PM

Brad Knowles writes:
> At 7:18 PM -0500 12/23/1996, Chip Rosenthal wrote:
> >Looks like AOL broke their DNS.  The MX records used to point to round
> >robins of A RRs.  Now they are pointing to CNAMEs.  That's illegal.
> >They should fix it.
> 
> 	I used to think it was illegal, too.  However, after
> conversations with Paul Vixie and other DNS gurus, it is now my
> understanding that this is not the greatest solution, but is not
> technically illegal

OK ... so everything I know *is* wrong.

I glanced through RFC-1912 ("Common DNS Errors"), STD-13 ("Domain
Name System"), and STD-14 ("Mail Routing and the Domain System").
I've found lots of "should nots" and "ought nots", but the only
"must not" was one specific case in STD-14 having to deal with
elimination of target MXes.

I'm kind of bothered that this deeply entrenched "fact" seems to
be wrong.

-- 
Chip Rosenthal * Unicom Systems Development * <chip@unicom.com>
URL: http://www.unicom.com/ * 4868D8BE10C86BDE 6017000BA783998E 
Helmet good.  Law bad.

Indexed By Date Previous: Re: List manager duties
From: David Lloyd-Jones <dlj@inforamp.net>
Next: Re: findmail.com instructions
From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: findmail.com instructions
From: "Michael C. Berch" <mcb@postmodern.com>
Next: Suggestions
From: Michael Rais <mrais@dti.net>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com