Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(January 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Managers are not Bystanders
From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn @ idyllmtn . com>
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 1997 17:08:22 -0800 (PST)
To: jennings @ cyberca . com (Penn Jennings)
Cc: list-managers @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <1.5.4.32.19970105004842.00728c80@isis.cyberca.com> from "Penn Jennings" at Jan 4, 97 07:48:42 pm

Penn Jennings continued to insist:
> I agree 100% with the idea that a bystander or list member has 0% obligation
> to anyone.  However, as the list MANAGER we are NOT bystanders.  I have no
> oblication to my coworkers.  If am a manager that fact changes.

My list subscribers are not my coworkers either.  Please tell me when
and how, exactly, I somehow gained an obligation to protect their life,
whatever that might mean to you?

In my opinion, my obligation only extends as far as my duties as a list
manager.  It's not my job to play judge, and decide if someone's made
a death threat against someone else; it's not my job to play psychologist
and try to discern someone's sanity level via email.  It's only my job
to keep the list functioning, and in most cases, that's not even my
_job_, it's my hobby, and I could dump the damn list any time it gets
to be too much work for me.

How exactly is my mailing list like a manager-employee situation again?

--Kynn, wishing Penn would clue up or give up already



References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Managers are not Bystanders
From: Penn Jennings <jennings@cyberca.com>
Next: Re: Managers are not Bystanders
From: Penn Jennings <jennings@cyberca.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Managers are not Bystanders
From: Penn Jennings <jennings@cyberca.com>
Next: Re: Managers are not Bystanders
From: Penn Jennings <jennings@cyberca.com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com