Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(January 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: DejaNews
From: Eric Thomas <ERIC @ VM . SE . LSOFT . COM>
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 1997 20:01:26 +0100
To: Gene Rackow <rackow @ mcs . anl . gov>, Bill Campbell <bill @ celestial . com>
Cc: List-Managers @ GreatCircle . COM, rackow @ antares . mcs . anl . gov
In-reply-to: Message of Sat, 4 Jan 1997 10:54:07 -0800 (PST) from Bill Campbell <bill@celestial.com>

This  is fine  and it  just means  that with  your respective  lists, the
exploders are part of the  normal distribution channel. This doesn't mean
that this is  the case with other lists. Personally,  I always discourage
local exploders, even  on public lists, because in  my experience they've
brought nothing but trouble and flames ("YOUR  SYSTEM SAYS I M NOT ON THE
LIST BUT THATS A  ****LIE**** AND IM H'\\'ONNA SUE YOUR  SORRY ASS IF YOU
DON"T REMOVE ME NOW AND I  MEAN ****NOW****"). That's one thing, but when
these people  start calling you on  the phone and then  calling your boss
and  end up  having to  explain redistributors  to a  manager who  barely
understands what a list is, you've reached a point where it's costing you
more in manpower to put up with idiots who can't run a redistributor than
it could possibly cost you in  extra hardware. And on private lists where
I need to approve subscribers, I don't allow exploders at all.

  Eric



Follow-Ups:
  • Re: DejaNews
    From: Kjetil Torgrim Homme <kjetilho@ifi.uio.no>
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Not Spam, but not Not-Spam.
From: Randy Cassingham <arcie@netcom.com>
Next: Re: Not Spam, but not Not-Spam.
From: dattier@wwa.com (David W. Tamkin)
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: DejaNews
From: "Kent S. Larsen II" <klarsen@panix.com>
Next: Re: DejaNews
From: Kjetil Torgrim Homme <kjetilho@ifi.uio.no>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com