Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(October 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: List owners are a public nuisance?
From: Mitch Collinsworth <mkc @ graphics . cornell . edu>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 97 20:26:00 -0500
To: Dave Voorhis <dave @ armchair . mb . ca>
Cc: List-Managers @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 29 Oct 97 19:01:13 CST." <3.0.1.32.19971029190113.007125c4@armchair.mb.ca>


>>P.S.  Sounds like a great business opportunity for some enterprising
>>software engineer... i.e. building a list management package that could
>>be completely run out of just one or two shell accounts without _any_
>>help from the local sysadmins.
>
>It exists, and can be run out of one account.  The combination of the qmail
>MTA and ezmlm MLM apparently allows shell users to create, destroy, and
>administer lists as they see fit.  See http://www.qmail.org.


Something is wrong with this picture.

If the local sysadmin is not assisting, chances are slim to none that
the installed MTA is something other than sendmail.  Given that, you're
not going to get incoming aliases to work without the sysadmin's
assistance.

-Mitch


                     "Families can't trust Disney"


Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: List owners are a public nuisance?
From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
Next: Re: List owners are a public nuisance?
From: Michelle Dick <artemis@rahul.net>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: List owners are a public nuisance?
From: Dave Voorhis <dave@armchair.mb.ca>
Next: Re: List owners are a public nuisance?
From: Sheryl Coppenger <sheryl@seas.gwu.edu>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com