Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(November 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: RE: Blocking all attachments
From: "Chamberlain, Michael A." <m . chamberlain @ ic . ac . uk>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 11:11:51 -0000
To: "'cecb @ mhv . net'" <cecb @ mhv . net>, alancz @ usa . net
Cc: list-managers @ greatcircle . com



> On 15 Nov 97, Alan Czarnek wrote:
>        Re: Blocking all attachments:
>  
> > >     There's a mailing list to which I belong which
> > has ongoing problems with members who continue
> > to send *very* large attachments (meg or more)
> > >which causes great problems to list subscribers.
> > 
> >      It's not the size of 'postings' that concerns 
> us.....it is the size of 'attachments'
> 
>      We don't have a problem with the length of postings.
> We just want to get rid of *all* attachments.
> 
How about setting up the MLM to send mails through metamail, get that 
to strip all attachments, (letting text/* attachments through). 
The stripping process could even place the attachments onto a webserver
or such and leave a message of 'Attachment X decoded and is available
at http://www.blah.com/list/attachments/X

Ok, so this does completely mundge the mail in some cases, and you need
to be careful that someone doesn't start using your mailing list as a
web publishing service. But it will remove attachments.

You may need to catch uuencoded stuff seperately, since metamail
won't deal with it. 

Mike.                         



Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Mailing all users?
From: Chris Cook <CookC@cardiff.ac.uk>
Next: Bounce message implications?
From: Thompson <thom@Qmail.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Blocking all attachments
From: Grant Neufeld <grant@achilles.net>
Next: Re: Blocking all attachments
From: Adam Bailey <adamb@tezcat.com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com