On Fri, 30 Jan 1998, Ray Jones wrote:
> I've never run into it and I'm not a lawyer, but it is definitely
> frivilous if your list is run like most. Are you charging for the list or
> is it a privilege that comes with membership to some organization or
> something similar? If so, perhaps. Otherwise, I wouldn't loose any sleep
> over it.
This is a 'normal' list open to the public. I do not charge for
membership, and zubscription is the member's choice.
<snip>
> is there simply because you feel like letting them. It is not a right and
> it is not a public forum except as you allow it to be. His charge that you
> are violating his right to free speech is ludricous.
I think this is the heart of the matter. He has no given right to
participate on my list, and if I kick him off he has no recourse. Some
people are just chomping at the bit to sue. Perhaps he intends to drain my
million$. If so, he has quite a surprise in store.
-Mitch
Follow-Ups:
References:
|
|
