Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(February 1998)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: "We do not relay" errors
From: "Michael C. Berch" <mcb @ postmodern . com>
Organization: Postmodern Consulting, California USA
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 1998 23:17:57 -0800
To: list-managers @ GreatCircle . COM
References: <199802151710.LAA25449@unicom.com>
Reply-to: mcb @ postmodern . com

Chip Rosenthal wrote: 
> [...]
> It is not always an easy task to institute unauthorized relay
> protection.  Stopping sendmail from relaying, for instance, is a
> lot more complicated than it ought to be. 

I think that statement should be qualified with "...if you're an ISP or have
an complex multi-domain site." 

Otherwise, it's trivial in the case of sendmail.  It took me maybe 10 minutes. 
(Copy a ruleset from either the sendmail.org or spam.abuse.net Web page
into sendmail.cf, add a couple of domains to a config file, kill and restart
the daemon. Done.  And test... another couple of minutes.)  

I really can't think of anything that would be simpler except a hypothetical
mailer that one configured by screen forms, and "permit relaying" was a yes/no
check box.  

-- 
Michael C. Berch
mcb@postmodern.com


Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: SMTP forwarding [Was: "We do not relay" errors]
From: Chip Rosenthal <chip@unicom.com>
Next: Re: I've seen the light!
From: richardm@cd.com (Richard Masoner)
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: "We do not relay" errors
From: Chip Rosenthal <chip@unicom.com>
Next: Re: "We do not relay" errors
From: Paul Hoffman / IMC <paulh@imc.org>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com