Eric Thomas wrote:
>WEBMASTER and so forth. Only one of the sections is about mailing lists,
>and then only about the -REQUEST address.
Eric, I have a question. Your reason for outright refusing to implement
this standard (if we assume the RFC dictates that the MLM sw reside at the
-request address) is that it would rob a Listserv list of its "human
contact" address, is that not correct?
But if I remember right, Listserv also uses listname-owner as a human
contact address (which is very sensible because -owner implies a human
whereas -request does not unless you are an ARPANET fossil).
Let's just grant that whoever wrote that RFC were a bunch of knuckleheads.
Regardless, do you require two addresses that point to humans? At least, is
it not simple to make it configurable, such that -request can point either
to a human or the MLM at the administrator's discretion?
Just curious.
--Ken
type2.com webmaster "He was too lazy to fix it, but not too lazy
to bitch." --Steve Dolan
References:
|
|
