Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(July 1998)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: individualized probe messages
From: murr rhame <murr @ vnet . net>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 16:27:08 -0400 (EDT)
To: Tom Neff <tneff @ panix . com>
Cc: List-Managers @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <000101bdbc98$d33c7ed0$017b7b0a@gillette>

On Fri, 31 Jul 1998, Tom Neff wrote:

> Instead of (or in addition to) serializing the Subject header in each probe
> message, you also serialize the From: and Errors-To: headers as follows:
> 
> 	From: test01347@mybox.mydomain.com
> 	Errors-To: errs01347@mybox.mydomain.com
> 	Subject: List Test #001347
> 
> 	This is a list test message - please ignore it.

Slick idea.  Along these same lines, you can use "plus" addressing for
regular unix mail boxes.  My normal address is murr@vnet.net.  Mail
sent to murr+abc123@vnet.net will also work just fine.  Plus
addressing may be handy those of us who don't have their own domain.


- murr -



References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: individualized probe messages
From: Dave Sill <de5-list-managers@sws5.ctd.ornl.gov>
Next: Re: Some thoughts on user validation....
From: Daniel Reed <djr@narnia.n.ml.org>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: individualized probe messages
From: Dave Sill <de5-list-managers@sws5.ctd.ornl.gov>
Next: Re: individualized probe messages
From: "Roger Fajman" <RAF@CU.NIH.GOV>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com