Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(August 1998)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: "probe failed" (was: Re: Unhelpful Bounce Of The Week)
From: "J. Philip Miller" <phil @ wubios . wustl . edu>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 1998 05:09:36 -0500 (CDT)
To: de5 @ sws5 . ctd . ornl . gov (Dave Sill)
Cc: list-managers @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: <19980731141020.2371.qmail@sws5.ctd.ornl.gov> from "Dave Sill" at Jul 31, 98 10:10:19 am

> "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@monkeys.com> wrote:
> >
> >Why does it make any sense to send yet another message to an address that
> >you already know and believe is dead?
> 
> Because you don't know it's dead--you just know it's bouncing. I've
> seen several cases where bounced messages were *also* successfully
> delivered. If you don't send the user a message saying "Hey, your mail 
> is bouncing", they may never realize it.
> 
which is why the majordomo solution of placing "bouncing subscribers" onto a
special "bounces" (list which sends the message that the subscriber has been
removed for many days after they have been removed) work so well.

-phil

> -Dave
> 
> 


-- 
     J. Philip Miller, Professor, Division of Biostatistics, Box 8067
       Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis MO 63110
	  phil@wubios.WUstl.edu - (314) 362-3617 [362-2693(FAX)]
		    http://www.biostat.wustl.edu/~phil


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: ownership change?
From: Bill Houle <bhoule@sparc.sandiegoca.ncr.com>
Next: Re: individualized probe messages
From: "Tom Neff" <tneff@panix.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: "probe failed" (was: Re: Unhelpful Bounce Of The Week)
From: Dave Sill <de5@sws5.ctd.ornl.gov>
Next: Re: "probe failed" (was: Re: Unhelpful Bounce Of The Week)
From: Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com