Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(August 1998)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: individualized probe messages
From: richardm @ cd . com (Richard Masoner)
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 1998 15:46:35 -0500 (CDT)
To: tneff @ panix . com (Tom Neff)
Cc: List-Managers @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <000001bdbee2$af2b9fc0$3e686420@newmicronpc> from "Tom Neff" at Aug 3, 98 09:29:04 am


> By the way, the suggestion was also made to use Unix "plus addressing", e.g.,
> From: jsmith+12345@something.com - it's a great suggestion but after trying it
> on three separate sites, I haven't gotten it to work.  Has Sendmail 8.9 broken
> this, perhaps?

Works for me with systems running sendmail 8.7 and 8.8.8.  It doesn't
work on the sendmail that comes with Solaris 2.6.  I haven't tried it
with a system running sendmail 8.9.

sendmail that comes with various versions of IRIX also seem to break.
sendmail which ships with IRIX 6.5, for example, is based on 8.8.8
code.

Richard Masoner
Champaign Illinois USA


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: individualized probe messages
From: "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@Mcs.Net>
Next: plus+addressing and probes
From: "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@Mcs.Net>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: individualized probe messages
From: "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@Mcs.Net>
Next: plus+addressing and probes
From: "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@Mcs.Net>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com