List-Managers (March 1999): Indexed by Date

List-Managers
March 1999
Indexed by Date

Other Indexes

Wednesday 31 March 1999
- Re: User docs about good (and bad) quoting (and other) practices
  From: Brian Edmonds <brian@gweep.bc.ca>
Tuesday 30 March 1999
- Re: User docs about good (and bad) quoting (and other)practices
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
- Re: User docs about good (and bad) quoting (and other) practices
  From: "Mally" <nemesis@paralynx.com>
Tuesday 30 March 1999
- Re: User docs about good (and bad) quoting (and other) practices
  From: Thomas Gramstad <thomasg@ifi.uio.no>
- Re: User docs about good (and bad) quoting (and other) practices
  From: "Bernie Cosell" <bernie@fantasyfarm.com>
- User docs about good (and bad) quoting (and other) practices
  From: Jeffrey Goldberg <J.Goldberg@Cranfield.ac.uk>
Friday 26 March 1999
- RE: sendmail -f
  From: "Andy Finkenstadt" <andyf@simutronics.com>
Thursday 25 March 1999
- Re: sendmail -f
  From: Mitch Collinsworth <mkc@Graphics.Cornell.EDU>
- Re: sendmail -f
  From: Mitch Collinsworth <mkc@Graphics.Cornell.EDU>
- Re: sendmail -f
  From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@monkeys.com>
- Re: sendmail -f
  From: Mitch Collinsworth <mkc@Graphics.Cornell.EDU>
- Re: list attacks
  From: "Mally" <nemesis@paralynx.com>
- Re: bulk mailing
  From: "Mally" <nemesis@paralynx.com>
- Re: InterNIC is History
  From: Joe Smith <jms@tardis.Tymnet.COM>
- Re: sendmail -f
  From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@monkeys.com>
- Re: InterNIC is History
  From: Vince Sabio <vince@humournet.com>
- Re: InterNIC is History
  From: Vince Sabio <vince@humournet.com>
Wednesday 24 March 1999
- Re: InterNIC is History
  From: "Dr. Rob Higgins" <rhiggins@cybercorp.net>
- Re: InterNIC is History
  From: "Nathan J. Mehl" <memory@blank.org>
- sendmail -f
  From: Mitch Collinsworth <mkc@Graphics.Cornell.EDU>
- Re: list attacks
  From: Rejo <subs@sisterray.xs4all.nl>
- Re: InterNIC is History
  From: Mitch Collinsworth <mkc@Graphics.Cornell.EDU>
- bulk mailing
  From: "Sally" <SallyHanford@bigfoot.com>
- Re: InterNIC is History
  From: Mitch Collinsworth <mkc@Graphics.Cornell.EDU>
- Re: InterNIC is History
  From: Vince Sabio <vince@humournet.com>
- Re: InterNIC is History
  From: Mitch Collinsworth <mkc@Graphics.Cornell.EDU>
- Re: InterNIC is History
  From: Vince Sabio <vince@humournet.com>
- Re: InterNIC is History
  From: Vince Sabio <vince@humournet.com>
- Re: InterNIC is History
  From: Mitch Collinsworth <mkc@Graphics.Cornell.EDU>
- Re: InterNIC is History
  From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@monkeys.com>
- Re: more list attacks - some mail headers
  From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@monkeys.com>
- Re: more list attacks - some mail headers
  From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@monkeys.com>
- InterNIC is History
  From: Vince Sabio <vince@humournet.com>
Tuesday 23 March 1999
- Re: list attacks
  From: Jeffrey Goldberg <J.Goldberg@Cranfield.ac.uk>
- Re: more list attacks - some mail headers
  From: Jeffrey Goldberg <J.Goldberg@Cranfield.ac.uk>
- Re: more list attacks - some mail headers
  From: Joe Brennan <brennan@watsun.cc.columbia.edu>
- Re: list attacks
  From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@monkeys.com>
Monday 22 March 1999
- HELP, please, Majordomo 1.94.4 - Sendmail config issues.
  From: "Michael E. Cupp, Jr." <0574@glasscity.net>
- Re: more list attacks - some mail headers
  From: Rejo <subs@sisterray.xs4all.nl>
- Re: more list attacks - some mail headers
  From: Olwen Williams <olwen@ihug.co.nz>
- Re: list attacks
  From: "Dr. Rob Higgins" <rhiggins@cybercorp.net>
Sunday 21 March 1999
- more list attacks - some mail headers
  From: Benji Spencer <spunge@spunge.org>
- Re: list attacks
  From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@monkeys.com>
- Re: list attacks
  From: "Nathan J. Mehl" <memory@blank.org>
Saturday 20 March 1999
- Re: list attacks
  From: Joe Brennan <brennan@watsun.cc.columbia.edu>
- Re: list attacks
  From: Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com>
Friday 19 March 1999
- Re: list attacks
  From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@monkeys.com>
- Re: list attacks
  From: Richard Kay <Rich_Kay@ect.uce.ac.uk>
- Re: list attacks
  From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@monkeys.com>
- Re: list attacks
  From: Vince Sabio <vince@humournet.com>
- list attacks
  From: Benji Spencer <spunge@spunge.org>
Tuesday 16 March 1999
- Re: Sender: header
  From: Brian Dorricott <brian-list@net-shopper.co.uk>
- Re: no 'get a real client' [kind of long as it turns out]
  From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
- Re: Sender: header
  From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@math.uh.edu>
- RE: no universal system, no 'get a real client
  From: "Karen Lopez, I.S.P." <KarenLopez@infoadvisors.com>
- Re: Sender: header
  From: Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>
- email/inclusion
  From: Julie Keywell <jkeywell@worldwidebaby.com>
- Sender: header
  From: Lawrence Weeks <dev@dm2.deskmedia.com>
- Re: no 'get a real client' [kind of long as it turns out]
  From: Michelle Dick <artemis@rahul.net>
Monday 15 March 1999
- Re: no 'get a real client' [kind of long as it turns out]
  From: "Tom Neff" <tneff@panix.com>
- Re: subject tagging or not
  From: Adam Bailey <adamb@lull.org>
- Re: subject tagging or not
  From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
- Re: Introduction / Questions
  From: David Shaw <dshaw@jabberwocky.com>
Sunday 14 March 1999
- Re: no universal system, no 'get a real client
  From: murr rhame <murr@vnet.net>
- Re: no universal system, no 'get a real client'
  From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
- Re: no universal system, no 'get a real client
  From: "Michael C. Berch" <mcb@postmodern.com>
- Re: no universal system, no 'get a real client'
  From: Adam Bailey <adamb@lull.org>
- no universal system, no 'get a real client
  From: "Karen Lopez, I.S.P." <KarenLopez@infoadvisors.com>
- Re: subject tagging or not
  From: murr rhame <murr@vnet.net>
- Re: subject tagging or not
  From: Adam Bailey <adamb@lull.org>
- Re:subject tagging or not
  From: "Karen Lopez, I.S.P." <KarenLopez@infoadvisors.com>
Friday 12 March 1999
- Re: no universal system, no 'get a real client'
  From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
- Re: no universal system, no 'get a real client'
  From: Michelle Dick <artemis@rahul.net>
Friday 12 March 1999
- Re: no universal system, no 'get a real client'
  From: "Tom Neff" <tneff@panix.com>
Thursday 11 March 1999
- subject tagging or not
  From: "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@Mcs.Net>
Wednesday 10 March 1999
- RE: List-Managers-Digest V8 #58
  From: "Karen Lopez, I.S.P." <KarenLopez@infoadvisors.com>
- Re: Introduction / Questions
  From: Dave Sill <de5-list-managers@sws5.ctd.ornl.gov>
- Re: Light bulb joke
  From: Ray Jones <rayjones@praline.no.neosoft.com>
- Re: Light bulb joke (repeats again)
  From: murr rhame <murr@vnet.net>
- Re: Introduction / Questions
  From: Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com>
Tuesday 09 March 1999
- Re: Introduction / Questions
  From: Jeremy Blackman <loki@maison-otaku.net>
- Re: Introduction / Questions
  From: Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com>
- Light bulb joke
  From: Alan Deikman <Alan.Deikman@znyx.com>
- Free list hosting at Email Solutions Inc.
  From: info@emailsol.com
- Re: Introduction / Questions
  From: Ray Jones <rayjones@praline.no.neosoft.com>
- Generic mailing list management system?
  From: Jeremy Blackman <loki@maison-otaku.net>
- Re: Monitoring a Mailing List Site
  From: Vince Sabio <vince@humournet.com>
Monday 08 March 1999
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject line
  From: Gerald Oskoboiny <gerald@impressive.net>
- Monitoring a Mailing List Site
  From: Margaret Levine Young <margy@gurus.com>
- Re: Introduction / Questions
  From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject line
  From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
- Re: Introduction / Questions
  From: Mika Tuupola <tuupola@appelsiini.net>
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject line
  From: Jeremy Blackman <loki@maison-otaku.net>
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject line
  From: Stan Ryckman <stanr@sunspot.tiac.net>
Sunday 07 March 1999
- Re: Size of HTML vs plaintext
  From: Gerald Oskoboiny <gerald@impressive.net>
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject line
  From: "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@Mcs.Net>
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject line
  From: Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com>
- Re: Definition of spam (was Topica)
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
- Re: Another wave of spam s*bscriptions?
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
- Introduction / Questions
  From: Jeremy Blackman <loki@maison-otaku.net>
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject line
  From: Keith Flippin <DrJesus@iss.dccc.edu>
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject line
  From: Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@lerdorf.on.ca>
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject line
  From: jet <juniper@ptw.com>
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject line
  From: Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@lerdorf.on.ca>
- Another wave of spam s*bscriptions?
  From: "Tom Neff" <tneff@panix.com>
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject line
  From: Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@lerdorf.on.ca>
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject line
  From: Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject line
  From: SRE <eckert@climber.org>
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject line
  From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@math.uh.edu>
- ONElist Shared Files
  From: Mark Fletcher <markf@corp.onelist.com>
- Making list archives public by any means... topica or otherwise.
  From: "Ken D." <ken@thinkage.com>
- Re: Definition of spam (was Topica)
  From: Michael Bennett <mjb@mailrelay.liffe.com>
Saturday 06 March 1999
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject line
  From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject line
  From: Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com>
Friday 05 March 1999
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject line
  From: "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@Mcs.Net>
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject line
  From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject line
  From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject line
  From: "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@Mcs.Net>
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject line
  From: Mitch Collinsworth <mkc@Graphics.Cornell.EDU>
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject line
  From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject line
  From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
- Re: How many email list subscribers does it take to change a light bulb?
  From: Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com>
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject line
  From: Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com>
Thursday 04 March 1999
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject line
  From: "Kenneth E. Bannister" <kenbannister@groundwater.com>
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject line
  From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
- How many email list subscribers does it take to change a light bulb?
  From: "Tom Rouse" <trouse@ix.netcom.com>
- Putting the listname on the Subject line
  From: "Bernie Cosell" <bernie@fantasyfarm.com>
- Re: Definition of spam (was Topica)
  From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
- Re: Topica-Dot-Com Open For Business
  From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
- Re: List problems on AOL?
  From: Adam Bailey <adamb@lull.org>
- Re: List problems on AOL?
  From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
Wednesday 03 March 1999
- Being a good list owner
  From: Michelle Dick <artemis@rahul.net>
- Re: Topica-Dot-Com Open For Business
  From: Michelle Dick <artemis@rahul.net>
- RE: Topica-Dot-Com Open For Business
  From: "Tina Lin" <tina@get.topica.com>
- Topica-Dot-Com Open For Business -+ fishbowl existence
  From: P Kayak <lev@bloomington.in.us>
- Re: Topica-Dot-Com Open For Business
  From: Kenny Paul <kenny@cisco.com>
- Re: Topica-Dot-Com Open For Business
  From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
- Re: Topica-Dot-Com Open For Business
  From: Dave Sill <de5-list-managers@sws5.ctd.ornl.gov>
- Re: Topica-Dot-Com Open For Business
  From: murr rhame <murr@vnet.net>
- Re: Definition of spam (was Topica)
  From: Jon Parry-McCulloch <jm@antipope.org>
- Re: Topica-Dot-Com Open For Business
  From: "Victor A. Wagner, Jr." <vawjr@rudbek.com>
- Re: Topica-Dot-Com Open For Business
  From: SRE <eckert@climber.org>
- Re: Topica-Dot-Com Open For Business
  From: "Victor A. Wagner, Jr." <vawjr@rudbek.com>
- Re: Definition of spam (was Topica)
  From: Randy Cassingham <arcie@thisistrue.com>
- Re: Topica-Dot-Com Open For Business
  From: murr rhame <murr@vnet.net>
- Defining spam(wasTopica) (Language=chess /game)
  From: P Kayak <lev@bloomington.in.us>
- Re: List problems on AOL?
  From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
- RE: Beta site at Topica
  From: "Alex Guerrero" <alex@get.topica.com>
- Re: Definition of spam (was Topica)
  From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
- Re: List problems on AOL?
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
Tuesday 02 March 1999
- Re: Topica-Dot-Com Open For Business
  From: Michelle Dick <artemis@rahul.net>
- Re: Topica-Dot-Com Open For Business
  From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
- Re: Topica-Dot-Com Open For Business
  From: "Victor A. Wagner, Jr." <vawjr@rudbek.com>
- Re: Topica-Dot-Com Open For Business
  From: Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com>
- Re: Topica-Dot-Com Open For Business
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
- Re: List problems on AOL?
  From: Adam Bailey <adamb@lull.org>
- Re: Topica-Dot-Com Open For Business
  From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
- Re: Definition of spam (was Topica)
  From: Randy Cassingham <arcie@thisistrue.com>
- Re: Topica-Dot-Com Open For Business
  From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
- Re: Topica-Dot-Com Open For Business
  From: Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com>
- Re: Beta site at Topica
  From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
- Re: Topica-Dot-Com Open For Business
  From: Stephanie da Silva <arielle@Taronga.COM>
- Spammer targetting recently-announced mailing lists
  From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
- Re: Topica-Dot-Com Open For Business
  From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
- Re: Topica-Dot-Com Open For Business
  From: Michelle Dick <artemis@rahul.net>
- Re: Topica-Dot-Com Open For Business
  From: Stephanie da Silva <arielle@Taronga.COM>
- Re: Topica-Dot-Com Open For Business
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
- Re: List problems on AOL?
  From: murr rhame <murr@vnet.net>
- Re: Topica-Dot-Com Open For Business
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
Monday 01 March 1999
- Re: Topica-Dot-Com Open For Business
  From: Michelle Dick <artemis@rahul.net>
- Re: Topica-Dot-Com Open For Business
  From: "Nathan J. Mehl" <memory@blank.org>
- Re: Topica-Dot-Com Open For Business
  From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@monkeys.com>
- Re: Topica-Dot-Com Open For Business
  From: Paul Hoffman / IMC <paulh@imc.org>
- Re: Size of HTML vs plaintext
  From: David Shaw <dshaw@jabberwocky.com>
- Re: List problems on AOL?
  From: Norbert Bollow <nb@thinkcoach.com>
- Re: List problems on AOL?
  From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
- Re: Size of HTML vs plaintext
  From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
- Re: List problems on AOL?
  From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
- Re: Topica-Dot-Com Open For Business
  From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
- Re: Topica-Dot-Com Open For Business
  From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
- re: size of HTML vs. plain text
  From: "Dr. Rob Higgins" <rhiggins@cybercorp.net>
- Re: List problems on AOL?
  From: murr rhame <murr@vnet.net>
- Re: Topica-Dot-Com Open For Business
  From: Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com>

Other Indexes

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.5.2