Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(March 1999)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: subject tagging or not
From: Adam Bailey <adamb @ lull . org>
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 11:22:01 -0600
Cc: <List-Managers @ GreatCircle . COM>

On 3/14/99 7:33 AM, murr rhame <murr@vnet.net> wrote...

>On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, Adam Bailey wrote:
>
>> I don't see any other way to do it. A mailing list management
>> package which supports subject tags but doesn't allow their
>> appearance to be set on a per-subscriber basis is broken.
>
>While I agree that a subject tag should be a user option, I disagree
>that this should be a required feature.

I agree. I never suggested that it should be required.


-- 
Adam Bailey    | Chicago, Illinois
adamb@lull.org | "Logic is the art of going wrong with
adamkb@aol.com |  confidence." - George Bernard Shaw
Finger for PGP | http://www.lull.org/adam/



Indexed By Date Previous: Re: subject tagging or not
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
Next: Re: no 'get a real client' [kind of long as it turns out]
From: "Tom Neff" <tneff@panix.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: subject tagging or not
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
Next: no universal system, no 'get a real client
From: "Karen Lopez, I.S.P." <KarenLopez@infoadvisors.com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com