List-Managers (April 1999): Indexed by Date

List-Managers
April 1999
Indexed by Date

Other Indexes

Friday 30 April 1999
- Re: When lawyers run the internet
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
Friday 30 April 1999
- Re: When lawyers run the internet
  From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
- Re: When lawyers run the internet
  From: Stan Ryckman <stanr@sunspot.tiac.net>
- Re: When lawyers run the internet
  From: mcb@postmodern.com (Michael C. Berch)
- When lawyers run the internet
  From: Mitch Collinsworth <mkc@Graphics.Cornell.EDU>
Monday 26 April 1999
- this list's mail (Was: Re: Another Iname/anonymous mail aliasing problem)
  From: Stan Ryckman <stanr@sunspot.tiac.net>
- Re: Another Iname/anonymous mail aliasing problem
  From: mcb@greatcircle.com (Michael C. Berch)
- Re: Another Iname/anonymous mail aliasing problem
  From: "Nathan J. Mehl" <memory@blank.org>
Monday 26 April 1999
- Re: Another Iname/anonymous mail aliasing problem
  From: "Mally" <nemesis@paralynx.com>
- world.std.com problems??
  From: cybergram <cybergram@ns.sympatico.ca>
- Re: Another Iname/anonymous mail aliasing problem
  From: mcb@greatcircle.com (Michael C. Berch)
- Re: responding vs. spamming
  From: Mitch Collinsworth <mkc@Graphics.Cornell.EDU>
- Re: VERP Power
  From: Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com>
- Re: indecipherable bounce messages
  From: John R Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
- Re: responding vs. spamming
  From: Cyndi Norman <cnorman@best.com>
Sunday 25 April 1999
- Re: Another Iname/anonymous mail aliasing problem
  From: "Nathan J. Mehl" <memory@blank.org>
- Best List Management Quote
  From: johnjohn@triceratops.com
- Re: indecipherable bounce messages
  From: Info-LabVIEW List Maintainer <info-labview-request@fsm-1.pica.army.mil>
Saturday 24 April 1999
- Re: VERP Power
  From: "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@Mcs.Net>
- Re: VERP power
  From: "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@Mcs.Net>
- Re: responding vs. spamming
  From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@monkeys.com>
- Re: Should iname.com be blacklisted? / VERP power
  From: Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com>
- Re: responding vs. spamming
  From: Norbert Bollow <nb@thinkcoach.com>
- Re: IMRSS notification considered NOT SPAM
  From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@monkeys.com>
- Re: Another Iname/anonymous mail aliasing problem
  From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@monkeys.com>
- Re: Should iname.com be blacklisted? / VERP power
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
- Re: responding vs. spamming
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
- Re: IMRSS notification considered NOT SPAM
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
- Re: Another Iname/anonymous mail aliasing problem
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
- Re: IMRSS notification considered NOT SPAM
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
- Re: responding vs. spamming
  From: murr rhame <murr@vnet.net>
- Re: responding vs. spamming
  From: "Victor A. Wagner, Jr." <vawjr@rudbek.com>
Friday 23 April 1999
- Re: responding vs. spamming
  From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@monkeys.com>
- Re: Should iname.com be blacklisted?
  From: Thomas Gramstad <thomasg@ifi.uio.no>
- Re: responding vs. spamming
  From: Mitch Collinsworth <mkc@Graphics.Cornell.EDU>
- Re: IMRSS notification considered NOT SPAM
  From: Mitch Collinsworth <mkc@Graphics.Cornell.EDU>
- Re: Another Iname/anonymous mail aliasing problem
  From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@monkeys.com>
- Re: IMRSS notification considered NOT SPAM
  From: Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com>
- Re: IMRSS notification considered NOT SPAM
  From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@monkeys.com>
- Re: responding vs. spamming
  From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@monkeys.com>
- Re: Should iname.com be blacklisted? / VERP power
  From: "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@Mcs.Net>
- Thanks
  From: "Steven G. Miller" <sgmiller@socrates.uophx.edu>
- Re: IMRSS notification considered NOT SPAM
  From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
- Another Iname/anonymous mail aliasing problem
  From: "Jenni \"Benji\" Baier" <benji@coiinc.com>
- Re: responding vs. spamming
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
- Re: IMRSS notification considered NOT SPAM
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
- Re: responding vs. spamming
  From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@monkeys.com>
- Re: IMRSS notification considered NOT SPAM
  From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@monkeys.com>
Thursday 22 April 1999
- Re: responding vs. spamming
  From: David Shaw <dshaw@jabberwocky.com>
- Re: Should iname.com be blacklisted?
  From: "Nathan J. Mehl" <memory@blank.org>
- IMRSS notification considered NOT SPAM
  From: "Tom Neff" <tneff@panix.com>
- Re: indecipherable bounce messages
  From: John R Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
- Re: Hiding a list in Majordomo 1.94.4
  From: John R Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
- Re: responding vs. spamming
  From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@monkeys.com>
- Re: responding vs. spamming
  From: David Shaw <dshaw@jabberwocky.com>
- Re: Should iname.com be blacklisted?
  From: Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com>
- Hiding a list in Majordomo 1.94.4
  From: "Steven G. Miller" <sgmiller@socrates.uophx.edu>
- Re: Trouble at Juno
  From: Tony Rose <rose@elon.edu>
- Re: responding vs. spamming
  From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@monkeys.com>
- Re: Should iname.com be blacklisted?
  From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@monkeys.com>
- Re: responding vs. spamming
  From: "Mally" <nemesis@paralynx.com>
- Re: responding vs. spamming
  From: "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@Mcs.Net>
- Re: Should iname.com be blacklisted?
  From: "Mally" <nemesis@paralynx.com>
- Re: Should iname.com be blacklisted?
  From: John R Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
- Re: responding vs. spamming
  From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@monkeys.com>
- Popular e-zines
  From: Dave Bigham <dbigham@cantec.com>
- Re: Should iname.com be blacklisted?
  From: "Mally" <nemesis@paralynx.com>
- Trouble at Juno
  From: Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com>
- Re: Topica and Liszt - the straight dope
  From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
- Re: Should iname.com be blacklisted?
  From: David Shaw <dshaw@jabberwocky.com>
Wednesday 21 April 1999
- Re: responding vs. spamming
  From: David Shaw <dshaw@jabberwocky.com>
- Re: responding vs. spamming
  From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@monkeys.com>
- Should iname.com be blacklisted?
  From: Thomas Gramstad <thomasg@ifi.uio.no>
- Re: responding vs. spamming
  From: "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@Mcs.Net>
Tuesday 20 April 1999
- Re: responding vs. spamming
  From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@monkeys.com>
- responding vs. spamming
  From: "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@Mcs.Net>
- Re: IMRSS humans and IMRSS bots
  From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@monkeys.com>
- Re: IMRSS humans and IMRSS bots
  From: "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@Mcs.Net>
- Re: IMRSS humans and IMRSS bots
  From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
- Re: IMRSS humans and IMRSS bots
  From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@monkeys.com>
Monday 19 April 1999
- IMRSS humans and IMRSS bots
  From: "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@Mcs.Net>
- Compilation copyright-some wording examples pls?
  From: "David W. Vaughan" <mail@david-vaughan.com>
- Re: Topica's behavior.
  From: "Tom Neff" <tneff@panix.com>
- RE: Topica and Liszt - the straight dope
  From: "Tina Lin" <tina@get.topica.com>
- Re: Topica and Liszt - the straight dope
  From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
- Re: recent posts about Topica
  From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@monkeys.com>
- Re: Topica and Liszt - the straight dope
  From: Norbert Bollow <nb@thinkcoach.com>
- Re: recent posts about Topica
  From: Norbert Bollow <nb@thinkcoach.com>
- Re: Topica and Liszt - the straight dope
  From: "Victor A. Wagner, Jr." <vawjr@rudbek.com>
- Re: Topica and Liszt - the straight dope
  From: Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com>
- Re: Topica and Liszt - the straight dope
  From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
- Re: Topica and Liszt - the straight dope
  From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
Sunday 18 April 1999
- Re: Errors-To: question
  From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
- Re: Errors-To: question
  From: Jeffrey Goldberg <J.Goldberg@Cranfield.ac.uk>
- Re: Topica and Liszt - the straight dope
  From: Vince Sabio <vince@humournet.com>
- Re: Errors-To: question
  From: John R Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
- Re: Errors-To: question
  From: "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@Mcs.Net>
Saturday 17 April 1999
- Topica and Liszt - the straight dope
  From: "Tom Neff" <tneff@panix.com>
- Errors-To: question
  From: "Bryce Ryan" <brycer@ultima.org>
- RE: recent posts about Topica
  From: "Chuck Renaud" <cjrenaud@sinnfree.org>
- Re: recent posts about Topica
  From: tibbs@hpc.uh.edu
- Re: recent posts about Topica
  From: "Roger Fajman" <RAF@CU.NIH.GOV>
- update on Topica's policies
  From: "Tina Lin" <tina@get.topica.com>
Thursday 15 April 1999
- Re: recent posts about Topica
  From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@monkeys.com>
Thursday 15 April 1999
- Re: On "Opt-out"
  From: Michelle Dick <artemis@rahul.net>
- Re: On "Opt-out" [a Postscript]
  From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
- Re: On "Opt-out"
  From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
- Re: On "Opt-out"
  From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@monkeys.com>
- Re: recent posts about Topica
  From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
- On "Opt-out"
  From: Scott Southwick <scotty@liszt.com>
- RE: recent posts about Topica
  From: Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com>
- Re: The Case Against C.A.S.E.
  From: Vince Sabio <vince@humournet.com>
- Re: The Case Against C.A.S.E.
  From: Jeffrey Goldberg <J.Goldberg@Cranfield.ac.uk>
- RE: recent posts about Topica
  From: Stan Ryckman <stanr@sunspot.tiac.net>
- Re: recent posts about Topica
  From: Cyndi Norman <cnorman@best.com>
Wednesday 14 April 1999
- RE: recent posts about Topica
  From: "Roger Fajman" <RAF@CU.NIH.GOV>
- RE: recent posts about Topica
  From: "Ariel Poler" <ariel@get.topica.com>
- A little list humor for you
  From: Mike Nolan <nolan@celery.tssi.com>
- RE: recent posts about Topica
  From: "Ariel Poler" <ariel@get.topica.com>
- The Case Against C.A.S.E.
  From: Vince Sabio <vince@humournet.com>
- Re: recent posts about Topica
  From: tibbs@hpc.uh.edu
- Re: And I thought Liszt/Tapioca were supposed to be doing it right
  From: Thomas Gramstad <thomasg@ifi.uio.no>
- Re: recent posts about Topica
  From: Kyle <kyle@mgsw3.jpl.nasa.gov>
- UTF-7
  From: "Marlene Coldwell" <airmamma@bellsouth.net>
- recent posts about Topica
  From: "Ariel Poler" <ariel@get.topica.com>
- Re: Free services: Where's the catch?
  From: Joe Smith <jms@Tymnet.COM>
- Re: Free services: Where's the catch?
  From: "Jenni \"Benji\" Baier" <benji@coiinc.com>
- Re: Free services: Where's the catch?
  From: "Jim Poston" <jim.poston@bigfoot.com>
- Re: Free services: Where's the catch?
  From: Mark Fletcher <markf@corp.onelist.com>
- Re: And I thought Liszt/Tapioca were supposed to be doing it right
  From: John R Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
Tuesday 13 April 1999
- Re: And I thought Liszt/Tapioca were supposed to be doing it right
  From: Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com>
- And I thought Liszt/Tapioca were supposed to be doing it right
  From: tibbs@hpc.uh.edu
Sunday 11 April 1999
- Re: Free services: Where's the catch?
  From: murr rhame <murr@vnet.net>
- Re: Free services: Where's the catch?
  From: David Sharp <david.sharp@afp.com>
- Re: Free services: Where's the catch?
  From: John R Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
Sunday 11 April 1999
- Re: Free services: Where's the catch?
  From: "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@Mcs.Net>
- Re: Free services: Where's the catch?
  From: Benji Spencer <spunge@spunge.org>
- Re: Free services: Where's the catch?
  From: Vince Sabio <vince@humournet.com>
- Re: Free services: Where's the catch?
  From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@civicnet.org>
- Re: Free services: Where's the catch?
  From: "Mally" <nemesis@paralynx.com>
- List Host Service Providers
  From: murr rhame <murr@vnet.net>
- Re: Free services: Where's the catch?
  From: murr rhame <murr@vnet.net>
- Free services: Where's the catch?
  From: David Sharp <david.sharp@afp.com>
Friday 09 April 1999
- Re: BCC posts being sent to list and others?
  From: Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com>
Friday 09 April 1999
- Thank you! Was: Re: BCC posts being sent to list and others?
  From: "Mally" <nemesis@paralynx.com>
- Re: BCC posts being sent to list and others?
  From: "Michael C. Berch" <mcb@postmodern.com>
- Liszt and Topica
  From: Scott Southwick <scotty@liszt.com>
- Re: BCC posts being sent to list and others?
  From: wenbing@statcan.ca (Bing WEN)
- Re: BCC posts being sent to list and others?
  From: Jeffrey Goldberg <J.Goldberg@Cranfield.ac.uk>
- Re: BCC posts being sent to list and others?
  From: "Mally" <nemesis@paralynx.com>
- Re: BCC posts being sent to list and others?
  From: mcb@postmodern.com (Michael C. Berch)
- Re: BCC posts being sent to list and others?
  From: James Lick <jlick@drivel.com>
- BCC posts being sent to list and others?
  From: "Mally" <nemesis@paralynx.com>
Wednesday 07 April 1999
- Thanks to everyone...
  From: Jenifer <Jenifer@DivineWebDesign.com>
Tuesday 06 April 1999
- List Hosting Services
  From: murr rhame <murr@vnet.net>
- Another Question...
  From: Jenifer <Jenifer@DivineWebDesign.com>
- New List Manager... help!
  From: Jenifer <Jenifer@DivineWebDesign.com>
Sunday 04 April 1999
- Re: your mail
  From: Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com>
Sunday 04 April 1999
- quoted printable and de-mime tools
  From: "Tom Neff" <tneff@panix.com>
- Re:
  From: "Bill Houle" <bhoule@airfiberinc.com>
Saturday 03 April 1999
- Re: your mail
  From: "Victor A. Wagner, Jr." <vawjr@rudbek.com>
- Re: your mail
  From: Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>
- Re: your mail
  From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@civicnet.org>
- Re: your mail
  From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@monkeys.com>
- Re: your mail
  From: John R Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
Friday 02 April 1999
- [no subject]
  From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@monkeys.com>
- [no subject]
  From: Doug_LaVerne@ccmail.osti.gov
Thursday 01 April 1999
- Return Receipts
  From: Tony Rose <rose@elon.edu>

Other Indexes

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.5.2