Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(November 1999)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: AOL
From: garyb @ fxt . com
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 99 10:41:30 -0800
To: List-Managers @ GreatCircle . COM
References: <199911160900.BAA21798@honor.greatcircle.com>
Reply-to: garyb @ fxt . com

> On Mon, 15 Nov 1999, Nick Simicich wrote:
> > Also, AOL is basically in complete violation of RFCs by not  
bouncing the
> > mail to the RFC821 MAIL FROM address.  They can get away with  
it, because
> > they are big.
> Ironically, in the past AOL was screamed at for doing just what you
> suggest.  When they got a mass spam from a forged address, all  
the bounces
> end up mailbombing some poor sap who happens to own the domain in
> question.  Because AOL is very big and is considered a target rich
> environment by spammers, this means that AOL ends up bouncing a lot of
> mail in a very short time.

I just read they estimate they receive an average 18 million SPAMs  
per day.  This is an example of how RFCs and other standards aren't  
always the best answer, because they often were written in a  
different environment than now exists (and other reasons, I'm sure).  
 


Indexed By Date Previous: Wassup spam [was Re: hey wassup uKCrypto ;)]
From: <jah@alien.bt.co.uk>
Next: Re: Wassup spam [was Re: hey wassup uKCrypto ;)]
From: Ian Goodyer <whgu0007@ermine.ox.ac.uk>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Fwd: Re: AOL
From: Nicole Marie Spring <spring@legalnurseconsultants.com>
Next: Re: AOL
From: garyb@fxt.com

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com