Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(November 1999)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: AOL dropping mail
From: "Bernie Cosell" <bernie @ fantasyfarm . com>
Organization: Fantasy Farm Fibers
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1999 09:56:12 -0500
To: list-managers @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <f12_9911220800@atbbs.com>
Reply-to: bernie @ fantasyfarm . com

On 21 Nov 99, at 19:28, David B. Smith wrote:

> I noticed you saying to All:
> 
>  CVR> I find it fascinating to watch people tell other folks how easy it is 
>  CVR> to do their job right, myself. I wonder how many people on this list 
>  CVR> could begin to architect AOL's system, much less build one that 
>  CVR> didn't implode in the first three minutes.

 [...]

> As for AOL's system, well, I think you've both got points.  On the one
> hand, a system the size of AOL is a whole 'nother phenomenon entirely.
> It can't be done just-the-same-but-bigger, because the shear volume
> makes it not just-the-same.
> 
> On the other hand, the offer for which they accepted money was "Internet
> email" et-al, and the acceptance was of those services as they had been
> done.  And the rest of the providers on the net -didn't- overcommit
> their resources as AOL did.

This isn't quite correct.  That's one of the reasons why 'spam' has 
caused so much trouble for ISPs: not because it is so hard for users to 
filter spam out of their mailboxes [although AOL folk with truly-crippled 
mail clients might disagree.:o), but for the rest, you can eliminate 
almost all of the stuff with modest filtering in Eudora, Peagsus, 
Communicator, etc] but because that volume of email *crashed* servers 
[and they'd talk about considering spam a "denial of service attack"] 
when the fact is just that they *NEVER* configured their system to give 
their users what they claimed and had always been counting on the fact 
that users didn't get giant amounts of mail.  [same as with things like 
'melissa' and such: they *crashed* mail servers all around the net not 
because they exploited some malicious flaw in mail server, but because 
the mail servers couldn't handle every user getting a few hundred 
messages all at the same time... that could well have been legitimate 
mail, and the only difference is that the sysops wouldn't have had anyone 
to blame]..

  /Bernie\
-- 
Bernie Cosell                     Fantasy Farm Fibers
mailto:bernie@fantasyfarm.com     Pearisburg, VA
    -->  Too many people, too few sheep  <--          


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Onelist.com allows forced subscriptions and spamming
From: Jeremy Blackman <loki@maison-otaku.net>
Next: Re: Onelist.com allows forced subscriptions and spamming
From: Carrie Lybecker <carriejl@home.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: AOL dropping mail
From: dbsmith@atbbs.com (David B. Smith)
Next: Re: AOL Situation Resolved, 2 (vetting)
From: garyb@fxt.com

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com