Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(October 2000)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: status of LIST-ID:
From: Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman @ imc . org>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 12:10:30 -0700
To: list-managers @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010261223210.4684-100000@two.elistx.com>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010261223210.4684-100000@two.elistx.com>

At 12:32 PM -0400 10/26/00, James M Galvin wrote:
>Specifically, LIST-ID: depends on a few grammar definitions that appear
>in the Internet Message Format document (revision to RFC822), which is a
>product of the DRUMS Working Group.  It is finally due to be released
>real-soon-now.

I'll believe it when I see it. This has been a very black eye for the IETF.

FWIW, I've been using List-ID on all IMC mailing lists for a long 
time now, and no one has complained. :-)

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium



Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: elist address or your address in message TO header
From: "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@ripco.com>
Next: Re: elist address or your address in message TO header
From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: status of LIST-ID:
From: James M Galvin <galvin@acm.org>
Next: Re: status of LIST-ID:
From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com