On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 03:35:26PM -0700, Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
> At 6:33 PM -0400 10/26/00, Tim Pierce wrote:
>
> >Have any of the proponents of to-header munging considered how
> >replies to the list will be handled? Are you going to move the
> >list's address to the Cc: header or something?
>
> That's why I suggested adding the concept of "reply to list" to
> "reply" and "reply all". Without that, and the associated header to
> support it, there really *isn't* a good answer that doesn't create
> some sort of problem in return.
OK, so this isn't a solution that works unless MUAs and their
users collectively implement a change to go along with it.
--
Regards,
Tim Pierce
RootsWeb.com lead system admonsterator
and Chief Hacking Officer
References:
|
|
