Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(April 2001)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: AOL Terms -- Revealed
From: murr rhame <murr @ vnet . net>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2001 21:33:40 -0400 (EDT)
To: list-managers @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <200104282037.f3SKbuP00439@ripco.com>

On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, David W. Tamkin wrote:

> Murr Rhame wrote,
> 
> | Reducing the number of recipients per-email doesn't help. ...

> But was it dropped because of a screwup by AOL, or was it
> dropped because of these policies?  

I can't say if the email was dropped due to a general failure or
due to filtering.  I can say that reducing the recipients to ONE
does NOT yield reliable mailing list delivery to AOL.  Our server
is set for a max of 30 simultaneous sends.

> It's not that you are comparing apples with oranges so much
> as that you might be comparing rotted apples with poisoned
> apples.

Yup.


- murr -




References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: AOL Terms -- Revealed
From: J C Lawrence <claw@kanga.nu>
Next: Re: AOL Terms -- Revealed
From: Roger Burton West <roger@firedrake.org>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: AOL Terms -- Revealed
From: J C Lawrence <claw@kanga.nu>
Next: Re: AOL Terms -- Revealed
From: Alan Clegg <alan@clegg.com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com