List-Managers: Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it

List-Managers
(April 2001)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it
From:	Tom Neff <tneff @ panix . com>
Date:	Mon, 30 Apr 2001 14:36:05 -0400
To:	"List-Managers @ greatcircle . com" <List-Managers @ greatcircle . com>
Cc:	John R Levine <johnl @ iecc . com>
In-reply-to:	<Pine.BSI.4.05L.10104301425100.21878-100000@tom.iecc.com>

--On Monday, April 30, 2001 2:26 PM -0400 John R Levine <johnl@iecc.com> 
wrote:
> That's what's known these days as a small list.  There are many legitimate
> lists with hundreds of thousands of addresses.  Infobeat's daily news
> summary is reputed to have over a million.

[and several others made similar comments]

As I remarked to Chuq privately, I was really thinking of discussion 
forums. We all receive E-newsletters that must number in the millions.  I 
would actually be in favor of regulating those a bit more.

Follow-Ups:

Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it
From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>

References:

Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it
From: "John R Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it From: Mitch Collinsworth <mitch@ccmr.cornell.edu>
Indexed By Date	Next:	Re: AOL Terms -- Revealed From: Adam Bailey <adamb@lull.org>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	RE: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it From: "Rick Rountree" <rick@dundee.net>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>